Showing posts with label Ex-Senator Scott Brown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ex-Senator Scott Brown. Show all posts

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Ex Senator Scott Brown -- What Comes Next...

For the "Good" of the Country 
and for the "Good" of Ex-Senator Scott Brown


Okay, sooner or later we have to try to figure out just who might want Ex-Senator Scott Brown back in the Senate so bad after his 7 point trouncing in the 2012 election by Elizabeth Warren.  We're going to fiddle around with this just a bit, but then MeanMesa is going to address the real issue floating through this quagmire of oligarch politics.

Obviously, if you are an ageing war monger who is terrified about the absolute void of relevance which is rushing to engulf you, in other words, if you are Senator John McCain, it's only natural that you'd love to "fly the flag" in one last glorious "Hurrah" before the owners of the Republican Party send you back to Arizona to graze quietly until the end.

Take it from MeanMesa, Senator John.  Old people can get, well, embarrassing, and you've gotten about as embarrassing as the GOPCon handlers are willing to go.  Yes, that means that they may actually shut off the sacred GOPCon money flow before your next campaign.  Wouldn't it be nice if you could just handle this one, last mission they've assigned for you with a little panache?

Given this "scene setting," it's hardly shocking that the pathetic old war horse pumped out another one of his absolute "line in the sand" declaration that UN Ambassador, Susan Rice's prospects for being confirmed as the next Secretary of State were dead on arrival.

This entire "tactical package" actually stinks of an overly adolescent, heavy handed McCain "sneak attack."  It's all remarkable similar to when he dramatically "suspended" his Presidential campaign to rush back to DC to solve the last great Republican "fiscal cliff" calamity in 2008. He had nothing to add to that catastrophe, and he clearly also has nothing to add to this, either.

The old war monger was clearly ordered to just shut up and take the hit.  MeanMesa is also sure that pummelling a well respected woman didn't bother him.  Pummelling a black woman bothered him even less.

With the tiniest bit of imagining, MeanMesa can hear the old war bird chortling at the prospect.  For John it was a gloriously warm reminiscence of the 1960's -- back when he was, at least theoretically, relevant.

The now infamous Benghazi attack was supposed to be the October surprise which would dissuade millions of Americans from voting for Barack Obama.  These voters were supposed to have been filled to the gunwales with a penetrating suspicion that Obama had incompetently botched yet another foreign policy challenge.

The commercial media -- everyone of them from FOX to PBS had already most certainly done their part --  had been instructed to "soften up" the field by their respective owners.

Now the "political genius" of John McCain had manipulated events to cook up a diabolical scheme to deliver the Massachusetts Senate seat back to the loser who had just lost the other Massachusetts Senate seat to Elizabeth Warren.  Here's what John's Secret Plan was looking like even before the President had nominated anyone for Secretary of State.

McCain: Susan Rice "not qualified"
 to be Secretary of State after Benghazi

(CBS News) John McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, has spoken out recently about what he calls "incompetence" of the Obama administration in dealing with the September 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Specifically, he called out administration officials for "gross, gross, outrageous statements" made in the days after the attack. 

And as U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice has been floated this week as a possible replacement for Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, McCain has vowed to try to block her nomination based on her statements following the consulate attack. Wednesday on "CBS This Morning," McCain sharply criticized Rice and Obama for their handling of the Benghazi attack.

McCain reiterated that he is primarily concerned with the "loss of four American lives in Benghazi" on September 11 and "the president not telling the truth about what happened there and what he knew and when he knew it." McCain is pushing for a select committee to investigate the administration's handling of the attack in Libya, to "get to the bottom of this, because the American people deserve the truth."

He defended his pledge to block Susan Rice's confirmation if President Obama nominates her as the next Secretary of State, insisting that "she's not qualified" and criticizing her for asserting the attack was spontaneous in media appearances following the attack.

McCain criticized Rice for going "on national television in defiance of the facts 5 days later," and added, "She is responsible to the Senate of the United States...I was on 'Face the Nation' the morning she came on and told that incredible story and right after the president of the Libyan National Assembly said it was al Qaeda...and yet she never changed her story."

While McCain was open to the possibility that a select investigative committee could clear of Rice of "misleading the American people," and allowed that the president and Secretary of State Clinton held responsibility in the matter as well, he continued his sharply worded attack.

Referring to Rice, he said she was at a minimum, guilty of "not being very bright, because it was obvious that this was not a 'flash mob' and there was additional information by the time she went on every news show...in America."
He insisted, "The consulate in Benghazi was turned into a death house and somebody has to be held responsible."

Turning to the turmoil surrounding now-retired CIA director David Petraeus, McCain said, "He's a soldier, he's a man who understands the responsibilities of office...he is the finest combination of intellect and leadership in American military that I have ever known."

Senator McCain added that General Allen "deserves the benefit of the investigation that is going on now," but maintained that the mission in Afghanistan will not be damaged by the investigation into Allen's conduct, because Allen was set to move to another job. 

Still, McCain expressed concerns about Afghanistan, "We've got much larger problems with the president continuing to announce withdrawals from Afghanistan earlier than his military generals have recommended...I'm not optimistic about how we're going to end up in Afghanistan because of the president's decisions, not General Allen's."  

(You can see the original CBS article  here.)

As McCain's teen age daredevil assault plan swung into action, the usual Republican talking heads rushed forward to deliver the important strategic message.  The air waves were inundated with one breathless repetition after another -- MeanMesa was wondering when Donald Trump would appear to parrot out the same words while standing somewhere on Wall Street.

[from top] Republican Senators Collins, Graham, Ayotte and McCain -- all think for themselves.
Now that the election is over, the behind the scenes scheme to somehow re-package the Ex-Senator for re-insertion into the deliberative body has completely disappeared from view in reports from the controlled media, but, believe MeanMesa on this one, it is still the "main hog at the trough" in the smoky back rooms of the GOP.

Just to review a few of the facts at play.

The oligarchs and corporatists who own the Republican Party spent hundreds of millions of cash to "sweep" the election we just held.  Even with all the anti-democracy crimes they purchased in the unfortunate states under their PAC control, their "batting average" was roughly what could be expected from a blindfolded school girl try to hit a target with a compound bow while a spider walked across her cheek.

Their money produced astonishingly dismal results.

And, all the time they were pouring in this money, they were dreaming of owning the Congress and the White House -- trinkets they could then add to their current "favorite" possession, the Supreme Court.  When the votes were counted, all those "investments" of theirs could just as well have been kindling for a home coming bon fire.

This is now pretty much old news, but there remains one part of the tale which is still quite alive, kicking and breathing.  To completely understand this last little part, we need to think for a moment about what value these oligarchs placed on taking or holding a Senate seat.  For example, Scott Brown practically drowned under the flood of cash they provided to get him re-elected.

Although Scott Brown had been an incredibly profitable little dandy for them while he was in the Senate, just about any Senator they could have gotten elected could have, ultimately, been pressed into the same service.  However, when Brown lost that seat to Elizabeth Warren, it was the equivalent of moving the "Nightmare on Elm Street" to a "Nightmare on Wall Street."

Oh dear.  Now, what's to be done?

The Massachusetts Special Election

Of course!  The prospect of the senior Massachusetts Senator, John Kerry, leaving the Senate to become Secretary of State or even Secretary of Defense would leave a delicious, mouth watering, little "opening" for the oligarchs to recover some of their lost territory.

Just the rumor of such a nomination had entire flocks of Wall Streets grabbing their check books for another flood of campaign contributions. If only they pumped in enough money, Rick Scott could return his pink leather shorts to the history books and, once again, penetrate the US Senate!

Of course there was the small matter of vivisecting the black girl from the UN ambassador's job, but that would amount to nothing for the experienced team of drawling GOP racists.  Owning full access to the obedient and entirely corporately controlled commercial media also wouldn't hurt any, either.

After all, the hill billies and bigots comprising the Republican base already hated Obama and considered black girls as mere chattel the good Lord had provided for those lonely moments after a night of beer guzzeling and burping at the American Legion.

The evisceration tool was to be a thinly repainted picture of the Benghazi disaster, absent any actual factual material, of course.  The GOP's low information base swallowed it all --  just as eagerly as Michelle Bachmann ate her corn dog.

If Kerry becomes the Secretary of State, the Governor of Massachusetts will appoint a replacement for who will serve as an "interim" Senator until the special election can be held.  Of course there is no possibility -- it would be illegal -- for the Governor to appoint an interim Senator from the opposing party, but when the special election is held, Republican candidates can also run.

Bingo!

At this very moment Wall Street oligarchs have already begun to drool over the prospect of pumping $100 Mn dollars into this special election.  If it begins to look like $100 Mn isn't doing the trick, $200 Mn can happen in a heartbeat.

That Senate seat is worth this much to them.  Compared to what a "wholly owned" Senator can do for them, $200 Mn is chickenfeed.  The oligarchs are just remembering the sweet moments -- and profits -- from when Scott Brown was their Senator last time.

There is a very comforting development which can be added to this story before we plunge into the MeanMesa conclusions about it.

Massachusetts Democratic Representative, Barney Frank, has announced that he is leaving the House of Representatives this year.  This came with the predictable litany of "personal reasons" -- for one, he just married his long time partner, James Ready, in July of last year. 

However, Barney Frank has also just placed his name in the running for that interim appointment.  MeanMesa encourages the Massachusetts Governor, Democrat Deval Patrick, to take him up on the offer.  Frank has been one of the most out spoken and effective Democrats in the House for years.

What is the Point?
MeanMesa's Conclusion

We may all be just a bit tempted to dispatch this weird tale of Washington machinations to our own growing pile of stoic refuse.  MeanMesa isn't particularly against such an attitude if for no other reason than the reasonable maintenance of psychological hygiene. However, as usual, there's a larger picture here which is worth closer examination.

There is a very old idea about just how one wins an election here in the United States, and what we see contemporary Republicans doing has basically nothing to do with that old idea.

That "old idea" has everything to do with presenting some sort of plan for what is to be done with the country.  Naturally, the plan should include some issues about the economy and foreign policy, but, since we are, at least ostensibly, a nation of laws, the plan should also include a bit of philosophy, a few ideas about laws and, perhaps, even a bit of ideology to round out the picture so everyone can understand where the plan is coming from if possible.

If the plan is a good one, that is, if it is an attractive plan to voters, the candidate and party which has put if forward stands a good chance in in the polls.  This is fair because there is no shortage of plans, and all those plans can originate from just about any sort of place on the political spectrum.

It's not that complicated.  This is the way to win an election and implement a plan.

Now, after threading through two entire posts about the oligarchs and their Scott Brown scheme, we simply aren't able to miss the vacuous absence of what we've been calling a plan.  In the place of that plan, we have seen almost nothing but things which are sickeningly similar to what we've been discussing here.

Instead of a plan, we see every possible manipulation of the electoral system which might elevate the political clout of a minority to that of a majority.  Let's look at a few examples.

1. huge, hidden money which only attacks political opponents and doesn't present any alternative plan
2. manipulation of electronic voting machines
3. removing legal voters from voter registration lists
4. not placing adequate polls, equipment and people in districts with populations of the opposing party
5. media jingoism, deception and horrible reporting -- i.e. without "follow up" questions
6. unchallenged out right lying in campaigns
7. candidates' brazen refusal to answer questions or reveal income histories
8. public air wave networks broadcasting exclusively partisan political content
9. commercial corporate media which is willing to report false information as news

See?  None of this has anything much to do with running our country.  All of these things are manifestations of what happens when money is injected into a system which was never designed to resist being dominated by such massive money being injected into it.

The oligarchs have invested untold millions into dominating the election system.  Our national election system has faced this violent onslaught while undefended.  There were neither champions, courts nor even a relief column which could come to the aid of our democratic elections as they faced this attack alone.

In the 2012 election that "relief column" amounted to lines of brave American citizens who stood in the cold and the weather for hours to -- against all odds -- cast ballots for the country's future.  The anti-democracy forces which gleefully erected all these barriers to voting were horrified when citizens stood their ground.

The voters weren't supposed to do that.  They were supposed to give up and go home.

Well, the voters didn't go home.

The Republicans and their oligarchic puppet masters may have already created a pile of cash as high as the John Hancock Tower to sweep their man, Scott Brown, back into the Senate, but the news is out now.

Those same "horrifying citizens" can protect our democracy from that kind of money and that kind of cynicism again.  In fact, it looks like the oligarchs should probably try to get used to elections -- and voters -- like these.

Moreover, MeanMesa is reinvigorated by the news that every Democratic heavy weight -- up to and including the President -- will be in Massachusetts for that special election.  Barack Obama no longer has to wonder if he can win another election.  Maybe some of the rest of the gutless Democrats will "absorb" some of his new found backbone by osmosis.

To the Democratic Party:  "It's time to release the Kraken."














EX-Senator Scott Brown R-Ma -- A Primer


What's the Little Pest Up To Now?

This is a story with two distinct parts -- in fact, possibly more than just two.  The first part, as MeanMesa would call it, the "low hanging fruit" is a tale of just more, predictable, post election, amateurish Republican creepiness. This first part has been covered fairly well in what's left of the media, although the tale has definitely been "dumbed down" so the hill billies could handle it.

Do we remember Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) the skunk who took Senator Ted Kennedy's seat after his death?  It turns out that there are two totally ironic aspects to Senator Brown's career.

First, Brown was an entirely unlikely man to suddenly be seated in the Senate chair still warm from the "Lion of the Senate."  Brown was hardly someone considered of the same stature as the late Kennedy.  We'll take a look at a few of the more notable stages of Scott's career.

If you have the appetite for it, you can "explore" the "entire picture" of Senator Brown's "early phase" in the COSMO article here.



Long before he was a politician, Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass.) posed nude for the centerfold of Cosmo. Sen. Brown won our “America’s Sexiest Man” contest and appeared in the June 1982 issue. In those days he was a 22-year-old law student at Boston College who was cramming for finals just days before stripping down for our photographer. 

Now, the senator's running for re-election, but unfortunately, we don't think his abs will come into play on the campaign trail.


Compared to some men in the GOP, this politician looks pretty damn good for his age—and we bet he still has an amazing body underneath his suit and tie. There have been plenty of pics of our president running around without his shirt, so now that a precedent has been set, we’re hoping to see Scott shirtless again.


The Campaign for Senator in the 2010 Special Election

Here are excerpts from the New York Times coverage of Brown's special election victory.  Read the whole article here.

G.O.P. Senate Victory Stuns Democrats


Published: January 19, 2010


BOSTON — Scott Brown, a little-known Republican state senator, rode an old pickup truck and a growing sense of unease among independent voters to an extraordinary upset Tuesday night when he was elected to fill the Senate seat that was long held by Edward M. Kennedy in the overwhelmingly Democratic state of Massachusetts.

Although the race has riveted the nation largely because it was seen as contributing to the success or defeat of the health care bill, the potency of the issue for voters here was difficult to gauge. That is because Massachusetts already has near-universal health coverage, thanks to a law passed when Mitt Romney, a Republican, was governor. 

Thus Massachusetts is one of the few states where the benefits promised by the national bill were expected to have little effect on how many of its residents got coverage, making it an unlikely place for a referendum on the health care bill. 
On Capitol Hill, the fate of the health care legislation was highly uncertain as Democratic leaders quickly gathered to plot strategy in the wake of the Republican victory.

Sentiment about how to proceed was mixed, with several lawmakers saying the House would not accept the Senate-passed plan. Top officials had said that approach was the party’s best alternative, and many members said they still believed it was crucial that Democrats pass a plan.

of unease among independent voters to an extraordinary upset Tuesday night when he was elected to fill the Senate seat that was long held by Edward M. Kennedy in the overwhelmingly Democratic state of Massachusetts. 

...


The election left Democrats in Congress scrambling to salvage a bill overhauling the nation’s health care system, which the late Mr. Kennedy had called “the cause of my life.” Mr. Brown has vowed to oppose the bill, and once he takes office the Democrats will no longer control the 60 votes in the Senate needed to overcome filibusters.

There were immediate signs that the bill had become imperiled. House members indicated they would not quickly pass the bill the Senate approved last month.
And after the results were announced, one centrist Democratic senator, Jim Webb of Virginia, called on Senate leaders to suspend any votes on the Democrats’ health care legislation until Mr. Brown is sworn into office. The election, he said, was a referendum on both health care and the integrity of the government process.

Beyond the bill, the election of a man supported by the Tea Party movement also represented an unexpected reproach by many voters to President Obama after his first year in office, and struck fear into the hearts of Democratic lawmakers, who are already worried about their prospects in the midterm elections later this year. 

Mr. Brown was able to appeal to independents who were anxious about the economy and concerned about the direction taken by Democrats, now that they control both Beacon Hill and Washington. He rallied his supporters when he said, at the last debate, that he was not running for Mr. Kennedy’s seat but for “the people’s seat.”

That seat, held for nearly half a century by Mr. Kennedy, the liberal lion of the Senate, will now be held for almost three full years by a Republican who has said he supports waterboarding as an interrogation technique for terrorism suspects, opposes a federal cap-and-trade program to reduce carbon emissions and opposes a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants unless they leave the country. It was a sharp swing of the pendulum, but even Democratic voters said they wanted the Obama administration to change direction.


...


Mr. Brown presented himself as a Massachusetts Everyman, featuring the pickup truck he drives around the state in his speeches and one of his television commercials, calling in to talk radio shows and campaigning with popular local sports figures.

The implications of the election drew nationwide attention, and millions of dollars of outside spending, to the race. It transformed what many had expected to be a sleepy, low-turnout special election on a snowy day in January into a high-profile contest that appeared to draw more voters than expected to the polls. There were reports of traffic jams outside suburban polling stations, while other polling stations had to call for extra ballots.

The late surge by Mr. Brown appeared to catch Democrats by surprise, causing them to scramble in the last week and a half of the campaign and hastily schedule an appearance by Mr. Obama with Ms. Coakley on Sunday afternoon.

...

Although the race has riveted the nation largely because it was seen as contributing to the success or defeat of the health care bill, the potency of the issue for voters here was difficult to gauge. That is because Massachusetts already has near-universal health coverage, thanks to a law passed when Mitt Romney, a Republican, was governor. 

Thus Massachusetts is one of the few states where the benefits promised by the national bill were expected to have little effect on how many of its residents got coverage, making it an unlikely place for a referendum on the health care bill. 
On Capitol Hill, the fate of the health care legislation was highly uncertain as Democratic leaders quickly gathered to plot strategy in the wake of the Republican victory.

Sentiment about how to proceed was mixed, with several lawmakers saying the House would not accept the Senate-passed plan. Top officials had said that approach was the party’s best alternative, and many members said they still believed it was crucial that Democrats pass a plan.

Three Years of Scott Brown in the Senate -- 
Who were the Senator's "friends?"

Scott Brown Has Another Wall Street-Tied Fundraiser
The Huffington Post  |  By Michael McAuliff Posted: Read the whole article here.

Scott Brown
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) likes to tout his credentials fighting Wall Street, but he's been doing awfully well lately raising money with the help of New York finance types, and Saturday he'll notch another such event.

An invitation shows that former Lehman Brothers bond trader Larry McDonald is rolling out the red carpet for Brown on Cape Cod, just a few days after New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg hosted Brown in the big Apple.

McDonald, who wrote the "A Colossal Failure of Common Sense" documenting Lehman's collapse, makes it very clear that he thinks Brown will be good for his industry.

McDonald, who wrote the "A Colossal Failure of Common Sense" documenting Lehman's collapse, makes it very clear that he thinks Brown will be good for his industry.

"As a New Yorker, working in the finance industry, I think it's of paramount importance Scott is reelected," McDonald writes in his pitch, warning that "pendulum swings" after financial catastrophes often lead to a situation where "initiative choking regulation is the ultimate job killer."

"We need Scott Brown to help lead our country out of this financial quicksand," McDonald argues, saying that recent failures of the firms MF Global and Peregrine Financial aren't evidence that better regulation is needed, but instead "go a long way to prove we don't need more rules and regulation, we need effective regulators."

He's also clear where he wants Brown to focus his efforts. "Above all, I want Scott on the Senate Finance Committee next year, he's the right choice, not his opponent," McDonald writes.

Brown cast the key vote in passing the Dodd-Frank bill to tighten financial industry regulations -- a fact he cites often in his ads -- but recent reporting also suggests he worked hard to weaken regulation, as well, which McDonald apparently sees as slowing that regulatory "pendulum swing."

"I've spent a lot of time with Scott Brown discussing what's right and wrong about financial reform and Dodd Frank, he gets it, and has the right ideas to make the crucial improvements needed," McDonald says.

From his Senate seat, Scott Brown "delivered the goods" to Wall Street,  make that "delivered the goods" big time. And, the banksters can, actually, be loyal in return -- even if it is only to each other.  They were certainly loyal to him.

We should add excerpts from the POLITICO article about Scott's unusually lucrative campaign contributions.

Wall Street filling Scott Brown's coffers

By ROBIN BRAVENDER | 10/1/12 3:32 PM EDT

Read the POLITICO article here.

Wall Street never wanted to see Elizabeth Warren sworn into the Senate, and now it's flooding her opponent’s campaign coffers in the final stretch of one of the closest races in the country.

Scott Brown raked in more than $500,000 from employees and PACs in the financial sector in June, the most recent month of data available, a report compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics for POLITICO found. That’s more than he’s gotten from the industry in any month since the start of last year.

Brown has already received more than $3.3 million from the finance, insurance and real estate industries this cycle, according to CRP, more than any other member of Congress or congressional candidate.

The cash is more a testament to the industry’s anxiety about Warren than a preference for Brown. Warren — a Harvard Law professor and the Democratic architect of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — built her reputation as an anti-Wall Street crusader.

As Warren’s performance in the polls improved, pulling ahead by a few points in the last few weeks, the industry's support for Brown has intensified.
"Some people held their money back because they wanted to see what would happen," said Scott Talbott, the top lobbyist at the Financial Services Roundtable. Now, "you'll see an increase because the race is so tight. At that point, the contributions make a difference."

Brown is getting even more help from a pro-banking super PAC set up to send cash to the industry’s friends in Congress and to help defeat its foes.

"Business support has always pretty much been there," for Brown, but there has been a "wakeup call" lately as "more people are becoming aware that Elizabeth Warren could become a senator,” said a GOP financial services lobbyist.
Brown's campaign defended his Wall Street support, noting that Warren also received cash from the financial services sector.

“Scott Brown was the tie-breaking vote on the Wall Street reform bill," said campaign spokeswoman Alleigh Marre. "He’s an independent thinker who does what he thinks is in the best interest of the people he represents. Both Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren accept financial industry donations, and in that respect their fundraising is the same.”

Warren had received about $560,000 from the industry, according to the most recent fundraising data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, but the group noted that detailed industry figures aren't available for Warren's campaign after March of this year.

In addition to possibly determining which party controls the Senate in 2013, the Massachusetts race could have specific policy and symbolic implications for the financial services sector. Warren is widely expected to seek a seat on the powerful Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee if she wins the Senate seat, a platform she could use to push for stricter Wall Street regulations.

Industry sources said the sector is fretting not only about what Warren might do legislatively from a perch on the banking committee but also about potential efforts to block legislation they support. And their concerns about Warren have gotten stronger as she's gained steam in the polls and kept up her fiery rhetoric on the campaign trail.

"She seems so invested in creating a narrative about how terrible corporate America is; how bad banks are ... just listen to her at her convention speech,” said the industry lobbyist.

During her prime time speech at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., earlier this month, Warren had plenty of harsh words for the industry.

“Wall Street CEOs — the same ones who wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs — still strut around Congress, no shame, demanding favors, and acting like we should thank them,” she said.

She also lauded President Barack Obama for his efforts to “clean up Wall Street” and her own efforts to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

“The big banks sure didn't like it, and they marshaled one of the biggest lobbying forces on earth to destroy the agency before it ever saw the light of day,” she said.

Her rhetoric and her affinity for clamping down on banks aren’t sitting well with many in the financial services sector.

"She's made her sentiment very clear that it appears that she's never seen a regulation she didn't like and there is absolutely no concern for the cost or the toll on jobs,” said Dennis Koons, president and CEO of the Michigan Bankers Association and an adviser to the Friends of Traditional Banking super PAC.
Earlier this month, the super PAC announced it was endorsing GOP candidates in two races: Brown in Massachusetts and Sen. Dean Heller in Nevada. The group is encouraging those with allegiances to the banking industry to funnel their cash into those two races.

"Scott Brown has evidenced a desire to be a reasonable voice to bridge issues for their own merit,” Koons said. "That is the impression that we get, that he is a person who … will work the issue, address the issue and try to do what's right for the American people."

Of course, not everyone in the industry was thrilled about jumping on board to back Brown.

The Massachusetts Republican has cast several key votes since joining the Senate in 2010 that still have some industry insiders fuming.

He voted for the sweeping Dodd-Frank regulatory reform bill, and last year irked many in the industry when he cast a critical vote against postponing a rule to cap “swipe fees,” or the amount banks can charge retailers when debit cards are used.

But Wall Street has shown it’s ready to support him anyway if it means helping Republicans clinch the Senate majority and keep Warren away from Capitol Hill.
Matt Packard, CEO of Central Bank in Provo, Utah, and chairman of the Friends of Traditional Banking super PAC, said Brown represents the right candidate to “get this country and our economy back on the right track.”

“Even though Senator Brown has not supported our views on every issue, we have found him to be reasonable and willing to listen to all sides of an issue,” he said.

Even if Senator Brown voted in favor imposing a cap on card "swipe" fees, Wall Street was quickly infatuated with him.  Estimates concerning the "return on investment" for the money the banksters poured into Brown's special election showed a very, very profitable investment.

And, if Scott Brown had any warts left to show, the emergence of Elizabeth Warren as an opponent for Brown's re-election to a full term frantically plastered the whole package with enough mascara to enthrall the brokers and bankers.  They were in love with their Massachusetts Senatorial "cash cow."

If you've been patient enough to wander through this helter skelter GOPCon story, you are now ready for the really fun part.  That will be the next post on this subject.

See you there.