Saturday, January 5, 2013

EX-Senator Scott Brown R-Ma -- A Primer


What's the Little Pest Up To Now?

This is a story with two distinct parts -- in fact, possibly more than just two.  The first part, as MeanMesa would call it, the "low hanging fruit" is a tale of just more, predictable, post election, amateurish Republican creepiness. This first part has been covered fairly well in what's left of the media, although the tale has definitely been "dumbed down" so the hill billies could handle it.

Do we remember Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) the skunk who took Senator Ted Kennedy's seat after his death?  It turns out that there are two totally ironic aspects to Senator Brown's career.

First, Brown was an entirely unlikely man to suddenly be seated in the Senate chair still warm from the "Lion of the Senate."  Brown was hardly someone considered of the same stature as the late Kennedy.  We'll take a look at a few of the more notable stages of Scott's career.

If you have the appetite for it, you can "explore" the "entire picture" of Senator Brown's "early phase" in the COSMO article here.



Long before he was a politician, Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass.) posed nude for the centerfold of Cosmo. Sen. Brown won our “America’s Sexiest Man” contest and appeared in the June 1982 issue. In those days he was a 22-year-old law student at Boston College who was cramming for finals just days before stripping down for our photographer. 

Now, the senator's running for re-election, but unfortunately, we don't think his abs will come into play on the campaign trail.


Compared to some men in the GOP, this politician looks pretty damn good for his age—and we bet he still has an amazing body underneath his suit and tie. There have been plenty of pics of our president running around without his shirt, so now that a precedent has been set, we’re hoping to see Scott shirtless again.


The Campaign for Senator in the 2010 Special Election

Here are excerpts from the New York Times coverage of Brown's special election victory.  Read the whole article here.

G.O.P. Senate Victory Stuns Democrats


Published: January 19, 2010


BOSTON — Scott Brown, a little-known Republican state senator, rode an old pickup truck and a growing sense of unease among independent voters to an extraordinary upset Tuesday night when he was elected to fill the Senate seat that was long held by Edward M. Kennedy in the overwhelmingly Democratic state of Massachusetts.

Although the race has riveted the nation largely because it was seen as contributing to the success or defeat of the health care bill, the potency of the issue for voters here was difficult to gauge. That is because Massachusetts already has near-universal health coverage, thanks to a law passed when Mitt Romney, a Republican, was governor. 

Thus Massachusetts is one of the few states where the benefits promised by the national bill were expected to have little effect on how many of its residents got coverage, making it an unlikely place for a referendum on the health care bill. 
On Capitol Hill, the fate of the health care legislation was highly uncertain as Democratic leaders quickly gathered to plot strategy in the wake of the Republican victory.

Sentiment about how to proceed was mixed, with several lawmakers saying the House would not accept the Senate-passed plan. Top officials had said that approach was the party’s best alternative, and many members said they still believed it was crucial that Democrats pass a plan.

of unease among independent voters to an extraordinary upset Tuesday night when he was elected to fill the Senate seat that was long held by Edward M. Kennedy in the overwhelmingly Democratic state of Massachusetts. 

...


The election left Democrats in Congress scrambling to salvage a bill overhauling the nation’s health care system, which the late Mr. Kennedy had called “the cause of my life.” Mr. Brown has vowed to oppose the bill, and once he takes office the Democrats will no longer control the 60 votes in the Senate needed to overcome filibusters.

There were immediate signs that the bill had become imperiled. House members indicated they would not quickly pass the bill the Senate approved last month.
And after the results were announced, one centrist Democratic senator, Jim Webb of Virginia, called on Senate leaders to suspend any votes on the Democrats’ health care legislation until Mr. Brown is sworn into office. The election, he said, was a referendum on both health care and the integrity of the government process.

Beyond the bill, the election of a man supported by the Tea Party movement also represented an unexpected reproach by many voters to President Obama after his first year in office, and struck fear into the hearts of Democratic lawmakers, who are already worried about their prospects in the midterm elections later this year. 

Mr. Brown was able to appeal to independents who were anxious about the economy and concerned about the direction taken by Democrats, now that they control both Beacon Hill and Washington. He rallied his supporters when he said, at the last debate, that he was not running for Mr. Kennedy’s seat but for “the people’s seat.”

That seat, held for nearly half a century by Mr. Kennedy, the liberal lion of the Senate, will now be held for almost three full years by a Republican who has said he supports waterboarding as an interrogation technique for terrorism suspects, opposes a federal cap-and-trade program to reduce carbon emissions and opposes a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants unless they leave the country. It was a sharp swing of the pendulum, but even Democratic voters said they wanted the Obama administration to change direction.


...


Mr. Brown presented himself as a Massachusetts Everyman, featuring the pickup truck he drives around the state in his speeches and one of his television commercials, calling in to talk radio shows and campaigning with popular local sports figures.

The implications of the election drew nationwide attention, and millions of dollars of outside spending, to the race. It transformed what many had expected to be a sleepy, low-turnout special election on a snowy day in January into a high-profile contest that appeared to draw more voters than expected to the polls. There were reports of traffic jams outside suburban polling stations, while other polling stations had to call for extra ballots.

The late surge by Mr. Brown appeared to catch Democrats by surprise, causing them to scramble in the last week and a half of the campaign and hastily schedule an appearance by Mr. Obama with Ms. Coakley on Sunday afternoon.

...

Although the race has riveted the nation largely because it was seen as contributing to the success or defeat of the health care bill, the potency of the issue for voters here was difficult to gauge. That is because Massachusetts already has near-universal health coverage, thanks to a law passed when Mitt Romney, a Republican, was governor. 

Thus Massachusetts is one of the few states where the benefits promised by the national bill were expected to have little effect on how many of its residents got coverage, making it an unlikely place for a referendum on the health care bill. 
On Capitol Hill, the fate of the health care legislation was highly uncertain as Democratic leaders quickly gathered to plot strategy in the wake of the Republican victory.

Sentiment about how to proceed was mixed, with several lawmakers saying the House would not accept the Senate-passed plan. Top officials had said that approach was the party’s best alternative, and many members said they still believed it was crucial that Democrats pass a plan.

Three Years of Scott Brown in the Senate -- 
Who were the Senator's "friends?"

Scott Brown Has Another Wall Street-Tied Fundraiser
The Huffington Post  |  By Michael McAuliff Posted: Read the whole article here.

Scott Brown
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) likes to tout his credentials fighting Wall Street, but he's been doing awfully well lately raising money with the help of New York finance types, and Saturday he'll notch another such event.

An invitation shows that former Lehman Brothers bond trader Larry McDonald is rolling out the red carpet for Brown on Cape Cod, just a few days after New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg hosted Brown in the big Apple.

McDonald, who wrote the "A Colossal Failure of Common Sense" documenting Lehman's collapse, makes it very clear that he thinks Brown will be good for his industry.

McDonald, who wrote the "A Colossal Failure of Common Sense" documenting Lehman's collapse, makes it very clear that he thinks Brown will be good for his industry.

"As a New Yorker, working in the finance industry, I think it's of paramount importance Scott is reelected," McDonald writes in his pitch, warning that "pendulum swings" after financial catastrophes often lead to a situation where "initiative choking regulation is the ultimate job killer."

"We need Scott Brown to help lead our country out of this financial quicksand," McDonald argues, saying that recent failures of the firms MF Global and Peregrine Financial aren't evidence that better regulation is needed, but instead "go a long way to prove we don't need more rules and regulation, we need effective regulators."

He's also clear where he wants Brown to focus his efforts. "Above all, I want Scott on the Senate Finance Committee next year, he's the right choice, not his opponent," McDonald writes.

Brown cast the key vote in passing the Dodd-Frank bill to tighten financial industry regulations -- a fact he cites often in his ads -- but recent reporting also suggests he worked hard to weaken regulation, as well, which McDonald apparently sees as slowing that regulatory "pendulum swing."

"I've spent a lot of time with Scott Brown discussing what's right and wrong about financial reform and Dodd Frank, he gets it, and has the right ideas to make the crucial improvements needed," McDonald says.

From his Senate seat, Scott Brown "delivered the goods" to Wall Street,  make that "delivered the goods" big time. And, the banksters can, actually, be loyal in return -- even if it is only to each other.  They were certainly loyal to him.

We should add excerpts from the POLITICO article about Scott's unusually lucrative campaign contributions.

Wall Street filling Scott Brown's coffers

By ROBIN BRAVENDER | 10/1/12 3:32 PM EDT

Read the POLITICO article here.

Wall Street never wanted to see Elizabeth Warren sworn into the Senate, and now it's flooding her opponent’s campaign coffers in the final stretch of one of the closest races in the country.

Scott Brown raked in more than $500,000 from employees and PACs in the financial sector in June, the most recent month of data available, a report compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics for POLITICO found. That’s more than he’s gotten from the industry in any month since the start of last year.

Brown has already received more than $3.3 million from the finance, insurance and real estate industries this cycle, according to CRP, more than any other member of Congress or congressional candidate.

The cash is more a testament to the industry’s anxiety about Warren than a preference for Brown. Warren — a Harvard Law professor and the Democratic architect of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — built her reputation as an anti-Wall Street crusader.

As Warren’s performance in the polls improved, pulling ahead by a few points in the last few weeks, the industry's support for Brown has intensified.
"Some people held their money back because they wanted to see what would happen," said Scott Talbott, the top lobbyist at the Financial Services Roundtable. Now, "you'll see an increase because the race is so tight. At that point, the contributions make a difference."

Brown is getting even more help from a pro-banking super PAC set up to send cash to the industry’s friends in Congress and to help defeat its foes.

"Business support has always pretty much been there," for Brown, but there has been a "wakeup call" lately as "more people are becoming aware that Elizabeth Warren could become a senator,” said a GOP financial services lobbyist.
Brown's campaign defended his Wall Street support, noting that Warren also received cash from the financial services sector.

“Scott Brown was the tie-breaking vote on the Wall Street reform bill," said campaign spokeswoman Alleigh Marre. "He’s an independent thinker who does what he thinks is in the best interest of the people he represents. Both Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren accept financial industry donations, and in that respect their fundraising is the same.”

Warren had received about $560,000 from the industry, according to the most recent fundraising data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, but the group noted that detailed industry figures aren't available for Warren's campaign after March of this year.

In addition to possibly determining which party controls the Senate in 2013, the Massachusetts race could have specific policy and symbolic implications for the financial services sector. Warren is widely expected to seek a seat on the powerful Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee if she wins the Senate seat, a platform she could use to push for stricter Wall Street regulations.

Industry sources said the sector is fretting not only about what Warren might do legislatively from a perch on the banking committee but also about potential efforts to block legislation they support. And their concerns about Warren have gotten stronger as she's gained steam in the polls and kept up her fiery rhetoric on the campaign trail.

"She seems so invested in creating a narrative about how terrible corporate America is; how bad banks are ... just listen to her at her convention speech,” said the industry lobbyist.

During her prime time speech at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., earlier this month, Warren had plenty of harsh words for the industry.

“Wall Street CEOs — the same ones who wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs — still strut around Congress, no shame, demanding favors, and acting like we should thank them,” she said.

She also lauded President Barack Obama for his efforts to “clean up Wall Street” and her own efforts to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

“The big banks sure didn't like it, and they marshaled one of the biggest lobbying forces on earth to destroy the agency before it ever saw the light of day,” she said.

Her rhetoric and her affinity for clamping down on banks aren’t sitting well with many in the financial services sector.

"She's made her sentiment very clear that it appears that she's never seen a regulation she didn't like and there is absolutely no concern for the cost or the toll on jobs,” said Dennis Koons, president and CEO of the Michigan Bankers Association and an adviser to the Friends of Traditional Banking super PAC.
Earlier this month, the super PAC announced it was endorsing GOP candidates in two races: Brown in Massachusetts and Sen. Dean Heller in Nevada. The group is encouraging those with allegiances to the banking industry to funnel their cash into those two races.

"Scott Brown has evidenced a desire to be a reasonable voice to bridge issues for their own merit,” Koons said. "That is the impression that we get, that he is a person who … will work the issue, address the issue and try to do what's right for the American people."

Of course, not everyone in the industry was thrilled about jumping on board to back Brown.

The Massachusetts Republican has cast several key votes since joining the Senate in 2010 that still have some industry insiders fuming.

He voted for the sweeping Dodd-Frank regulatory reform bill, and last year irked many in the industry when he cast a critical vote against postponing a rule to cap “swipe fees,” or the amount banks can charge retailers when debit cards are used.

But Wall Street has shown it’s ready to support him anyway if it means helping Republicans clinch the Senate majority and keep Warren away from Capitol Hill.
Matt Packard, CEO of Central Bank in Provo, Utah, and chairman of the Friends of Traditional Banking super PAC, said Brown represents the right candidate to “get this country and our economy back on the right track.”

“Even though Senator Brown has not supported our views on every issue, we have found him to be reasonable and willing to listen to all sides of an issue,” he said.

Even if Senator Brown voted in favor imposing a cap on card "swipe" fees, Wall Street was quickly infatuated with him.  Estimates concerning the "return on investment" for the money the banksters poured into Brown's special election showed a very, very profitable investment.

And, if Scott Brown had any warts left to show, the emergence of Elizabeth Warren as an opponent for Brown's re-election to a full term frantically plastered the whole package with enough mascara to enthrall the brokers and bankers.  They were in love with their Massachusetts Senatorial "cash cow."

If you've been patient enough to wander through this helter skelter GOPCon story, you are now ready for the really fun part.  That will be the next post on this subject.

See you there.


No comments:

Post a Comment