Showing posts with label WashPost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WashPost. Show all posts

Monday, October 23, 2017

Blood on Trump's Hands - A 4 Soldiers Reader

A Quick Note From MeanMesa:

This kind of post that is the most challenging of all. This story has many "moving parts" which complicate its telling. Nonetheless, it is so important that it's "worth the doing." Perhaps the best approach is offer a series of articles which are the product of excellent reporting on the matter. [Additional links will be provided as possible.]

No. This is not about Trump's meat handed phone call. Nonetheless, when the pathological liar inhabiting the Oval Office is silent, it becomes immediately important to determine exactly why he is terrified of something. Further, when the comedic distractions which so tickle his 30% base lurch into "frantic mode," the imperative to delve deeply becomes even more pressing. This is where we are.


The ISIS Attack in Niger Was
 "Just One Of Those Things," Right?
The same thing probably goes with why
 Trump wouldn't even mention it for weeks, right?

Naturally, when the "news" of the events in Niger which resulted in four US military deaths surfaced, there was an instant "PR Problem" in the White House. When the response to this "problem" turned out to be dead silence on the part of the President, all sorts of possible explanations began to roll around in the mind of MeanMesa.

The incessant drivel about NFL players and "supporting the troops" continued at a "fever pitch;" the President gave FEMA -- and of course, himself -- an A+ for the way Puerto Rico had been "handled;" the constant stream of insults and threats against the N. Korean dictator rattled forward as usual;  and, the GOP "budget" slimed its way through the GOP House and the GOP Senate, promising the Owners of the Republican Party a scandalously gigantic tax break to pack into the pockets of their already dynastic wealth. But, unlike previous, carefully devised "distraction overloads" from Trump, this time all the usual fevered incitement seemed to be falling flat. Talking to Americans about dead soldiers turned out to not be a "optional, discretionary" duty for the President. Neither was, it turned out, the delicate responsibility of calling the widows.

Naturally, Trump headed directly for the golf course. As usual, he immediately began making this "hidden matter" worse and worse by the day. Since then, it has become apparent that Trump's confidence rattling, "self-imagined image problem" was clearly not to be eased much by a pathetic effort to assuage his goblins with mindless golfing. A severely artificial con man is rarely finds an eviscerating -- ripping and clawing -- "moment of truth" painless.

Let's plow right into the "moving parts."


Chadian Special Forces' Active Role in 
Fighting Sub-Saharan Terrorists
Chadian forces are also active in Mali, Niger,
 Nigeria and other nations in the region.

First, compared to the forces of other nations in the region, the Chadian Special Forces are remarkably effective. They have the well deserved record of assisting regional governments in successfully fighting terrorists -- especially Boko Haram -- in a long series of "hot spots." 

Chadian Special Forces, until a couple of weeks ago, were assisting the government of Niger in its effort to drive ISIS fighters out of the country. In many cases Chadian Special Forces troops were working directly with American troops in various military functions.

[map credit]
"Initially, Boko Haram’s presence on the Chadian side of the lake was limited. But violence rapidly escalated in 2015, partly in reaction to the intervention by Chadian forces in neighbouring states."

"In the aftermath of the April 2016 presidential election, which saw Idriss Déby win a fifth term, Chad became central to the struggle against terrorism in Africa."


Chad is a poor country. For years a single dictator essentially "absorbed" the revenue generated by Chad's oil resources. [Hissene Habre - dictator of Chad/BBC] The man who finally replaced him, Idriss Deby, is currently the democratically elected President. [President of Chad wins 5th term, promises to re-instate term limits after this term- BBC News] Even before Chad reverted to a democratic government, it was clear that the country would be facing the "African style" of Islamic terrorism, hence the substantial investment in its Special Forces.

Now, Chadian forces involved in the effort are considered to be some of the very best. Further, the Chadian government and people have been quite generous in sending these troops to aid their neighbors -- including their neighbors in Niger. Chadian troops helped the French retake the upper region of Mali from Boko Haram.

However, the cost of such "expeditions" has rapidly increased beyond what the economy of Chad can sustain.

Nonetheless, when compared to other nations receiving US aid for anti-terrorism, any aid sent to Chad would have been a very good investment. The record supporting that claim is already "on the books," based on Chadian successes. [Exercises With US Military Help Chad Fight Extremism/NPR]


FP - Foreign Policy - the magazine

America Should Beware a Chadian Military Scorned
Stung by its inclusion on the Trump administration’s travel ban, 
Chad is already making life harder for U.S. troops in Africa.
BY 
 | 

For reasons that remain unclear, U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration included the Central African nation of Chad in the latest iteration of its infamous travel ban, which also targets citizens from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The move came as a shock to most observers, not least because Chad, in the White House’s own words, is an “important and valuable counterterrorism partner” in a region threatened by al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and Boko Haram. Now Washington may learn, in the least pleasant fashion possible, just how important and valuable Chad has been.


Fighting Boko Haram. [Chadian Military/FRONTERA]
In the wake of the new travel ban announcement on Sept. 24, Chad has withdrawn hundreds of troops from neighboring Niger, where up to 2,000 of its soldiers were part of a coalition battling Boko Haram. The Chadian government has not yet offered an official explanation for the pullout, but Communications Minister Madeleine Alingué condemned Chad’s inclusion on the travel ban, saying that it “seriously undermines” the “good relations between the two countries, notably in the fight against terrorism.”

Despite its relative poverty, Chad plays an outsized role in African security and politics. Its troops are considered some of the most capable in the region, and its president, Idriss Déby, has won considerable influence with the African Union, France, and, until recently at least, the United States by deploying them to clean up others’ messes. In addition to leading the fight against Boko Haram, Chad’s military is busy countering al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and other jihadis in the Sahel, a volatile region that includes parts of Mali and Niger.

The groundwork for the country’s current security partnership with Washington was laid in northern Mali in 2013, when Chadian soldiers fought alongside French forces in some of the harshest terrain and deadliest battles as they sought to roll back jihadis who had dug in there. When less than two years later Boko Haram began seizing huge swaths of territory in northeastern Nigeria, Washington looked to Chad as part of a regional response because it didn’t believe Nigeria could handle the threat on its own. Chad and Niger, which also has a budding security partnership with the United States, mounted an armed intervention in early 2015 that pushed Boko Haram out of numerous towns and broke up the group’s Islamic emirate. Later, Chad took on a leading role in the Multinational Joint Task Force, a larger military coalition that included troops from four other nations, hosting its new headquarters as well as a coordination cell partly staffed by Western experts advising the campaign against Boko Haram.

Chad has also continued to play an important role in Mali, where the United States is a significant contributor to the United Nations peacekeeping mission and aides French counterterrorism efforts with financial, logistical, and intelligence support. It is a former Chadian minister, Mahamat Saleh Annadif, who leads the U.N. mission in Mali, and Chad has signed on to another regional effort — the so-called “Sahel G5” force that also includes forces from Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger — that is tasked with improving security in the troubled Mali-Niger-Burkina Faso border region. The G5 force was a brainchild of the French, and the Trump administration has been skeptical of the effort because of the projected cost but initially gave it some rhetorical support.

But while Chad has burnished its image abroad by participating in military operations, it has struggled with mounting unrest and economic hardship at home. An authoritarian leader who seized power in 1990, Déby finds himself increasingly threatened by student and labor union unrest as persistently low oil prices and mounting security expenditures have at times left his government unable to pay workers. As his position has grown more tenuous, Déby has been blunt with his Western partners: Give more money, or Chad will scale back its regional security commitments.

France and others have heeded Déby’s threats. In June, the International Monetary Fund approved over $300 million in extra loans for Chad. In September, a donor roundtable in Paris generated nearly $20 billion in pledges designed to support Chad’s 2017-2021 national development plan.

But instead of rewarding Chad as other donors have, the Trump administration has punished it. Experts are still baffled by the decision to include the country on the latest travel ban, which was partially blocked by a federal judge on Tuesday, hours before it was set to go into effect.

The administration said it was because “several terrorist groups are active within Chad or in the surrounding region” and the government has failed to “adequately share public-safety and terrorism-related information.” Yet on the first count, at least — terrorist groups active within its borders — Chad is better off than many of its neighbors. One possible explanation for this discrepancy, which would be preposterous in any administration except this one, is that the architects of the ban, having repeatedly heard the phrases “Boko Haram” and “Lake Chad” in the same sentence, assumed that Chad must be the epicenter of Boko Haram. (Lake Chad in fact lies on the border of Chad and three other countries, and Boko Haram is mostly confined to northern Nigeria, northern Cameroon, and southeastern Niger.)


Regardless of the rationale for including Chad in the ban, the decision was a mistake. The partial withdrawal of Chadian soldiers from places like southeastern Niger, an area that has been heavily targeted by Boko Haram in recent years, could result in swift and serious consequences.

EXPERTS ARE STILL BAFFLED BY THE DECISION TO INCLUDE THE COUNTRY ON THE LATEST TRAVEL BAN, WHICH WAS PARTIALLY BLOCKED BY A FEDERAL JUDGE ON TUESDAY, HOURS BEFORE IT WAS SET TO GO INTO EFFECT.

Initial reports indicate that the security situation there has already begun to deteriorate in the vacuum left by departing Chadian forces: Boko Haram attacks have escalated since the withdrawal, and so has banditry, a chronic regional problem. A security vacuum will also have political and humanitarian consequences, imperiling tentative deradicalization and amnesty efforts by Niger’s government and making it more difficult to get vital assistance to millions of displaced people in the Lake Chad region.

A more significant Chadian pullback would likely embolden Boko Haram, which already seems to be getting some of its mojo back. This year has seen an uptick not just in suicide bombings, but also in audacious and successful attacks on Nigerian military convoys and bases. If Chadian authorities take even more dramatic steps to halt their cooperation with the United States and other regional militaries involved in the fight against Boko Haram, the Multinational Joint Task Force itself could be partly dismantled, as could the coordination cell in Chad’s capital, developments that would impede the entire regional effort to counter the terrorist group.

There are good reasons why the United States should consider reducing its dependence on Chad, Déby’s autocratic rule being one of them, but the travel ban does not appear to be part of a considered rebalancing of U.S. security relationships in the region. The confusion and anger engendered by Chad’s inclusion, moreover, seem unlikely to lead to reform. Of course, the last word about the travel ban has not been said, as Tuesday’s court ruling suggests. Déby is a tough and skilled negotiator who has faced down savvier interlocutors than Trump — including the World Bank and ExxonMobil — and has come away each time with at least part of what he wanted. The Chadian president is likely betting that with his forces withdrawn from Niger, the Trump administration will quickly come to appreciate his country’s security contributions and remove it from the list. The danger for Déby, Washington, and especially for the region, however, is that the administration’s characteristic disorganization and stubbornness may delay a course correction until after serious harm has occurred.

Being Screwed by EXXON "Sours the Deal" With Chad
EXXON CEO [turned Secretary of State], Rex Tillerson thinks a 2% oil royalty is just too high.
Looks like Big Daddy and Rex decided to get even.

Exxon in negotiations with Chad
NOVEMBER 15, 2016 Reuters staff


(Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) is negotiating with Chad over a record $74 billion fine the U.S. oil company was told to pay by a court in the central African nation over unpaid royalties, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.


Exxon has appealed the Oct. 5 court ruling, but the appeals court hearing has been delayed because of the talks, Bloomberg reported, citing a lawyer for Exxon. 

Exxon declined to comment.

The court decision fined a consortium led by Exxon over 44 trillion CFA francs ($73.44 billion) - nearly four times BP’s Deepwater Horizon settlement and roughly seven times Chad’s annual gross domestic product.



The unpaid royalties stem from a dispute over fees, sources in the Chadian Finance Ministry have told Reuters. The Finance Ministry, they said, is seeking a 2 percent royalty fee from the consortium, a rate the defendants have said is higher than the agreed level.

Secretary of State Rex "Settles" His Feud
 With the Uppity Chadians
Trump jumps in -- who cares about US troops when there's big money on the table?

An unavoidable component of the path to oligarchy or mobster is the necessity to leave "examples" of a "failure to cooperate" which can be observed by those to be intimidated. Is this beginning to sound "thuggy?" MeanMesa agrees. Too bad the story is too complicated for anyone in Trump's base.




Why did the U.S. travel ban add counterterrorism partner Chad? 
No one seems quite sure.
By Kevin Sieff September 25, 2017
[Visit the original article here.


NAIROBI — For years, the United States and its European allies have praised the central African nation of Chad as a helpful partner in the fight against terrorism.

But on Sunday — shocking both Chadians and regional analysts — the Trump administration announced that Chad's citizens would be included in the newest American travel ban. In a statement, the U.S. government cited the presence of terrorist groups in the country and said Chad “does not adequately share public safety and terrorism related information.”

Indeed, Chad does face a number of terrorist threats, most notably from Boko Haram along its western border with Nigeria. But many other countries in the region are not included in the U.S. travel restrictions, including Nigeria, Mali and Niger are considered far more vulnerable to terrorism.

“The reaction has been astonishment and then indignation,” said Nour Ibedou, director of the Chadian Human Rights Association. “We do not understand how our country achieved this lack of trust from the United States.”

A statement from Chad's government asked Trump to reconsider a decision that “seriously undermines the image of Chad and the good relations between the two countries.”

“The Chadian Government expresses its incomprehension in the face of the official reasons behind this decision,” the statement added, “reasons that contrast with the efforts and the ongoing commitments of Chad in the fight against terrorism.”

Under the new U.S. order, North Korea also was added, as well as more targeted restrictions on Venezuela’s leaders and their families. Citizens from Somalia, Libya, Yemen and Syria remained on the list.

According to the Institute for Security Studies, Boko Haram waged more than 120 attacks in Nigeria last year, but only four in Chad. In its statement, the White House said al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) was also active “within Chad or in the surrounding region.” But AQIM has a much more substantial presence in Mali, where militants frequently attack United Nations peacekeepers.

“We don’t have any significant indications of other violent extremist activity [aside from Boko Haram], so in that respect, this is completely baffling,” said Richard Moncrieff, central Africa director at the International Crisis Group.

Perhaps even more mystifying, Chad has proved to be one of the United States’ most willing counterterrorism partners in the region. In March, about 2,000 U.S. troops staged a military exercise in Chad aimed at bolstering regional security forces. In recent years, Air Force personnel have used the country as a staging ground for Boko Haram surveillance missions.

“Our nations are working together to build a better future, not just in Chad, but across the entire region,” Ambassador Alexander M. Laskaris, the deputy to the commander for civil-military engagement at the U.S. Africa Command, said during a visit last year.

Chad’s capital, Ndjamena, is also used as the headquarters for France’s 4,000-person regional counterterrorism mission, called Operation Barkhane. Chad’s own military has intervened across borders, in the Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria. In 2013, forces reportedly killed an al-Qaeda commander in Mali. In 2014 and 2015, during major battles against Boko Haram, Chadian troops were considered by many to be more effective than Nigerian soldiers, even though Chad is a much poorer nation.

“The E.U., France and the U.S. in particular today consider Déby as their principal partner in the fight against terrorism in the Sahel,” wrote Moncrieff of Chad's president, Idriss Déby, earlier this month.

So why Chad's sudden inclusion in the travel ban?

For now, that's largely a mystery, particularly to Chadians. But the decision seems to hinge on problems with information sharing, according to the U.S. statement. Administration officials said they removed neighboring Sudan from the list of banned countries because cooperation had improved in recent months.

It is also unclear whether Chad has the administrative capacity to share information about visa applicants, or whether the U.S. moves reflect a growing strains in relations.

Chad's economy has struggled as the price of oil, its biggest source of income, has fallen in recent years. In a report last year, the State Department suggested that economic problems had led to a deterioration in the country's security forces.

“The Government of Chad continued to prioritize counterterrorism efforts at the highest level; however, the worsening financial crisis affected its ability to meet even basic financial commitments, such as paying police and military salaries,” said a State Department report last year.

Moncrieff said that any lack of cooperation with the U.S. was likely due to a lack of bureaucratic capacity rather than a refusal to assist on terrorism issues.

“It has a very, very weak state capacity, and that’s not helped by a massive financial crunch at the moment,” he said.

Chad has emerged as one of the most important hosts of refugees in the region, with nearly 400,000 refugees living in the country, including many who have fled from the Darfur region of Sudan.

So, How Did All This Turn Out?

After being included in the latest Trump travel ban, Chad withdrew its Special Forces troops from Niger. The move required two weeks. Days after the withdrawal, the "locals" in Niger with whom the Americans had been working, became suspiciously jumpy. Almost immediately ISIS fighters in Niger resumed terrorist attacks. Days after the terrorist attacks began, the American soldiers were ambushed and killed. 

In between his golf trips, Trump has been accusing the kneeling NFL players of "not supporting the troops," and telling lies about the Florida Congresswoman who was with the Johnson family when he called.

Sgt. La David Johnson, US Army [image/ABC]

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Trump GOP - Permanently Monetizing All Health Care

March 7, 2017 - "Black Tuesday" 
Republican "Replacement"
 For ObamaCare Emerges From
Its Locked Dungeon in Ryan's House Basement
Be sure to take your vitamins. This is NOT the time to get sick.

While the details of the new Republican "plan" remain intentionally very foggy, the article [below] lays out what the Republicans will almost certainly be hiding from sight as they reveal the product of months of their work behind closed doors.

MeanMesa is sure that they have been hard at this task before them, led at every juncture by the steady guidance of Donald J. Trump, the Party's unquestioned ideological guide and directer. 

The GOP probably got off to a really great start after receiving a nice package of "campaign donations" from the Big Health lobbyists on K Street, but once these compassionate, patriotic, caring souls encountered the part where it became necessary to "think of others," they, of course, got stuck.

Republicans don't do "others."

  The Maddow Blog/MSNBC
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan shares a laugh with Republican members of Congress after signing legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, and to cut off federal funding of Planned Parenthood during an enrollment ceremony in the Rayburn Room at the U.S. Capitol January 7, 2016.
[ Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images]
New Republican health 
care blueprint falls far short
Congressional Republicans have been working on a health care reform plan – behind closed doors, away from public scrutiny – for more than seven years. Periodically, GOP leaders assure everyone that their alternative to “Obamacare” is nearly complete, and its unveiling is imminent, only to quietly change the subject soon after.

As lawmakers left Congress late last week for a week-long break, the Republican replacement for the ACA still doesn’t exist, but House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) didn’t want to send his members home empty-handed – especially knowing that they’d face concerned constituents, fearing what GOP lawmakers might do to their families’ health security – so Republicans left DC armed with an outline of some vague ideas about where the majority party is headed.

That’s the good news. We’re a long way from having a real, detailed GOP plan to consider, but we can at least take a closer look at what Ryan & Co. have come up with thus far, which is better than literally nothing.

The bad news is, you’re really not going to like the Republican outline. A New York Times editorial yesterday summarized the key provisions nicely:
In a half-baked policy paper released on Thursday, the House speaker, Paul Ryan, trotted out washed-up ideas for “improving” the country’s health care system that would do anything but. For example, the paper calls for reducing spending on Medicaid, which now provides insurance to more than 74 million poor, disabled and older people. Many millions of them would be cast out of the program.

The Republican plan would also force most people who don’t get their health insurance through an employer to pay more by slashing subsidies that the A.C.A., or Obamacare, now provides. The proposal would allow families to sock away more money in health savings accounts, which may sound good at first but would primarily benefit affluent people who can afford to save more.
As is always the case, the devil is in the details, and the specifics of the latest Republican “plan” – I’m using the word loosely – can’t be examined in earnest because they don’t yet exist.

That said, we know enough about the effects of the key GOP priorities to understand the damage that would follow the implementation of the Republican ideas. Dismantling how Medicaid works, for example, would do brutal harm to millions of low-income Americans.

And we haven’t even touched on the politics yet.

As many GOP lawmakers are starting to notice, the Affordable Care Act is suddenly enjoying its strongest support to date, and activism to protect the reform law against attacks from the right has put Republicans on the defensive. It’s against this backdrop that Paul Ryan not only has to figure out a way to kill “Obamacare” without leaving tens of millions of families with nothing, but also pay for his party’s alternative without the ACA-related taxes his party is desperate to repeal.

The latest proposed approach, as Vox explained last week, calls for capping the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health insurance, which would cause massive systemic disruptions, and which many congressional Republicans – and their lobbyist pals – would very likely reject. Republicans could try to scale back the policy, but then they wouldn’t have the money to afford their own plan.

Complicating matters further, many conservative lawmakers have also voiced opposition to Ryan’s plan for refundable tax credits, dismissing the policy as an entitlement comparable to “Obamacare lite.” (This isn’t the only area of disagreement within the majority party.)

And speaking of tax credits, as a New York Times report added last week, the heart of the Republicans’ latest outline is an approach that would “redirect federal support away from poorer Americans and toward people who are wealthier,” in part by eliminating ACA taxes that currently target the richest Americans, while simultaneously eliminating ACA benefits that currently go those with the least.

What about coverage levels, you ask? Without more details, it’s difficult to say with confidence exactly how many families would lose their health security if the Republican approach becomes law, but one GOP lawmaker conceded just last night to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes that some Americans who currently have insurance may lose it under the Republican plan – which would not only cause a political nightmare for the party, but would also directly contradict the assurances the public has received from Donald Trump and his White House team.

And yet, despite all of this, the GOP leadership insists that the party’s actual plan will be unveiled as early as next month, at which point the debate can really begin, as Americans start to discover how vastly superior the Affordable Care Act is to the Republican alternative.

We’ll get into the legislative hurdles if/when the process gets to that point, but as things stand, there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical about the GOP’s health care ambitions.

Additional Reading

Although the Maddow Blog article appeared a week ago, it is included here because it lays out the central questions which we will all want to answer as the thing moves ahead from here. MeanMesa suspects that there will be a serious Republican attempt to lather this pig up to look like something else with major coats of "fake news," so keep an eye of how this will affect you and your family's coverage.

For a look at two additional, helpful articles about what is found in the new plan, visit these links.

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Will the Inauguration Become Trump's "Beer Hall Putsch?"

"Anything Goes Because I'm a Billionaire"
The flamboyance turns dark -- very dark.

After watching Trump's "politics" for several months, one rather strange observation is grown from being a mere "curiosity" to become an unsettling reality. That observation?

Absolutely nothing Donald Trump has said, promised or done seems to have upset any significant section of his political supporters. 

[There may be a welcome exception to this general observation. The imposition of Republican "pillage and plunder" mayhem with respect to obliterating the health insurance of millions of these same supporters might be "the breaking point," marking where the "spell" is to be lifted, shocking the sufferers back into reality.]

Perhaps the most striking example of this "devil may care" flippancy is seen in the reaction -- or non-reaction -- of the Christian evangelical dead enders in the Party's maniacal right. The video with Billie Bush [Ironically, in the sense of the inevitability of karma, the blood cousin of W. himself...] was not the product of devious, Democratic Partisan "opposition research." It flew out, entirely voluntarily, straight from the self-elevating, narcissistic mouth of the candidate.

However, to these mindless Trumpkins none of these revelations about the candidate perturbed his meteoric ascension. MeanMesa wants to explicitly point out this phenomenon before we get to the deliciously tasty "conspiracy" part of this post.

The Christian Evangelical Trumpkins
 Dump Their Religion
 in Inebriated "Revenge Voting"
Nothing matters except "getting even" ... with something.

"Grabbing them by the Pussy" had no impact whatsoever on the biblical lunatics supporting the man from the usually semi-crazy, evangelical right. The current "whispers" that Trump indulged himself in a "golden shower" with a troop of flashy Moscow hookers is now eliciting the same, banal response.

Although this post concerns primarily Trumps extremely suspicious "preparations" for the "Inauguration" festivities in Washington, DC, the shockingly passive evangelical "anything goes" response to his growing "parade of peccadilloes" demonstrates an important feature of the over all, political process at play.

This is important for this post because it suggests that Donald Trump expects the same, passive response to any "trouble" he might encounter in DC on his big day. If his supporters hold him to such a low bar with respect to his dalliances with Russian hookers, perhaps he hopes that they will, similarly, have little to say about what he might be planning to pull in the nation's capitol. 

The following quoted material comes from an article in The Atlantic.

The Evangelical Reckoning Over Donald Trump


White, conservative Christians voted for the Republican candidate by a huge margin, but this election revealed deep fractures among leaders and churches—especially along racial lines.



Emma Green, November 10, 2016


[Only three excerpts of the original article are presented here. Read the entire -- excellent -- article here The Atlantic]

The moral high ground of a unified “evangelical voice” have shifted, too. This election was not a race to the top on matters of personal integrity; as Al Mohler, the vocally anti-Trump president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, said during the campaign, if he were to support Trump, he would have to apologize to Bill Clinton, who he called out for sexual immorality in the ’90s.

“You’ve now hitched your wagon to the GOP and Mr. Trump in ways that just ruin moral credibility in the country,” said Thabiti Anyabwile, a theologically conservative Baptist pastor in D.C. “I don’t know how you recover from that.”
...

Some evangelical leaders who supported Trump dismissed the allegations of misogyny as a distraction. “To suggest that people who are voting for Trump are ratifying the worst of his behavior is simply not logical,” said Eric Metaxas, a radio-show host who has been a vocal supporter of Trump. “If people want to bludgeon you with, ‘Beth Moore said this and this,’ there’s no reaction except to say that anyone who has suffered [sexual abuse]—that’s one of the most serious things there is.”

On this and other issues, nearly everyone I spoke with emphasized a need for healing. As Newbell put it: “My heart is to care for the women have have been abused.” Metaxas said he got an email from a friend disavowing their relationship because he had supported Trump’s rise. “Fundamentally, as a Christian, we have to know that there is pain on the other side, and if I claim to be a Christian, I have to care about the pain on the other side,” Metaxas said.
...

The evangelical leaders who supported Trump during the election do not see the future in such dire terms. “I suspect that in time they will see he is not the person they feared,” said Metaxas. “Because if he were that person, I myself would be the first to say, ‘I made a mistake. I made a terrible mistake.’ I have been hopeful that he would be fundamentally decent, and that most Americans would see that.”

Others say that Trump is a new man, that everything he’s said on the campaign trail—about women, Mexicans, Muslims, the “inner city,” and more—does not reflect who he truly is. “I’ve seen a lot of change in him in the last year or two. He’s a different man,” said Falwell Jr. “I believe everybody is redeemable, and I think Donald Trump has been positively influenced by the American public that he’s interacted with over the past year.”

After months and months of pushing back against Trump, Moore said he hopes he’s proven wrong about the president-elect. “My prayer is that Jerry Falwell Jr.’s view of Donald Trump turns out to be the right view,” he said. “My prayer is that four years from now, my attitude is to say that Jerry Falwell Jr. knew depths of this leader’s spirituality and character that I didn’t know.”

He’ll also be praying for Trump, he said, just like the Bible commands.


The Trump "Inauguration:"
A Washington DC "Beer Hall Putsch?"
MeanMesa issues a travel warning.
This could be dangerous -- and deadly.


What, exactly, was the infamous "beer hall putsch?
[Excerpted. Read the entire article  here Beer Hall Putsch/WIKI]

The Beer Hall Putsch [image_WIKI]
The attempted putsch was inspired by Benito Mussolini's successful March on Rome, from 22 to 29 October 1922. Hitler and his associates planned to use Munich as a base for a march against Germany's Weimar Republic government. But the circumstances were different from those in Italy. Hitler came to the realization that Kahr sought to control him and was not ready to act against the government in Berlin. Hitler wanted to seize a critical moment for successful popular agitation and support. He decided to take matters into his own hands. Hitler, along with a large detachment of SA, marched on the Bürgerbräukeller, where Kahr was making a speech in front of 3,000 people.

In the cold, dark evening, 603 SA surrounded the beer hall and a machine gun was set up in the auditorium. Hitler, surrounded by his associates Hermann Göring, Alfred Rosenberg, Rudolf Hess, Ernst Hanfstaengl, Ulrich Graf, Johann Aigner, Adolf Lenk, Max Amann, Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, Wilhelm Adam, and others (some 20 in all), advanced through the crowded auditorium. Unable to be heard above the crowd, Hitler fired a shot into the ceiling and jumped on a chair yelling: "The national revolution has broken out! The hall is filled with six hundred men. Nobody is allowed to leave." He went on to state the Bavarian government was deposed and declared the formation of a new government with Ludendorff.

Hitler, accompanied by Hess, Lenk and Graf, ordered the triumvirate of Kahr, Seisser, and Lossow into an adjoining room at gunpoint and demanded they support the putsch. Hitler had promised Lossow a few days earlier that he would not attempt a coup, but now thought that he would get an immediate response of affirmation from them, imploring Kahr to accept the position of Regent of Bavaria. Kahr replied that he could not be expected to collaborate, especially as he had been taken out of the auditorium under heavy guard.

MeanMesa's Strange Fear
[Yes, this is OFFICIALLY a conspiracy theory. Watch out.]

There are, presently, a collection of "coincidences" which have managed to set these old bones on fire. Let's have a look -- in each case MeanMesa will provide a link for additional reading and information.

1. The Trump Transition Team has replaced the previous General officer in command of the Washington DC National Guard with a Trump "appointment." This is to occur at the moment Donald Trump has been Inaugurated.


2. The electrical power to the Senate Hearing on the Trump CIA Director Pick is mysteriously cut when a Democratic Senator asks a question about Russia.



"10:41 a.m.

Electricity is out in two Senate office buildings, interrupting a hearing for President elect-Donald Trump's nominee to be CIA director.

A spokesman for the Architect of the Capitol says power is out in most of the Hart Senate Office Building and in some of the adjacent Dirksen building. Crews are working to restore power.

The confirmation hearing for congressman Mike Pompeo of Kansas is being moved to a new room."


3. When House Member, Diane Waters [D-CA], asked about gutting the Securities and Exchange Commission, the CSPAN feed from the House Chamber switched to advertisements being broadcast on RT. [RT is the propaganda channel of the Russian Federation government. RT stands for "Russia Today."]


4. A Firestorm of Protests Will Take Place at Donald Trump's Inauguration


5.  Inauguration security focusing on truck terror attack threat, Homeland Security says

/2017/01/13/security-trump-inauguration-focuses-truck-attack-threat-homeland-security/USAToday


6. The FBI has thoroughly demonstrated that it is no longer trustworthy. The 2016  Trump campaign relentlessly incited Republican supporters that nothing was trustworthy -- the media, the agreement made with Iran, NATO, the sitting President and so on.

Normally, confronting this present conundrum, Americans would be looking to the FBI to investigate the domestic side of affairs and inform them of its findings. None of this is going on currently.


7. Absolutely no one in the US government can stop Trump from doing whatever he wants. This proposition can easily expand to include a "Beer hall putsch" on Inauguration day.


The Trump Inauguration
Washington, DC, Under "Emergency" Martial Law
Across the nation the Trumpkins are "lovin' it."

Let's have a quiet moment to reflect on the bizarre confluence of factors approaching us on Inauguration day. We already know that Washington will be filled with protesters -- probably more protesters than citizens gathered to celebrate Trump's dubious ascent to power. Naturally, with all this emotion on hand, we can expect things to get "juicy."

[Tickets to the Inauguration are slowly evaporating in the pockets of ambitious scalpers. Nobody wants them. Everyone who wants one, has it. 2017/1/16/1621063/A-desperate-Donald-Trump-records-a-message-on-Facebook-offering-free-Inauguration-tickets/DailyKOS]

We have also seen how quickly protesters get under The Donald's remarkably thin skin. His tantrums and tirades during his campaign rallies -- to the effervescent, brutal excitement of his supporters present -- fully revealed Trump's out-of-control, vile response to any "voice" not obediently consistent with his latest meme.

But those instances involved only a handful of people showing up to express their dissent. Inauguration day protests are estimated to be massive. Further, the "stakes" have patiently grown very much higher. Most of the reckless types who attended his campaign rallies had at least a fleeting impulse to remain somewhat civil. MeanMesa predicts that the crowds at the Inauguration may well be somewhat more...uh...restive.

Donald Trump's "problem" will be entirely centered on "how this looks." 

His Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, has already expressed how "troubling" the President-elect finds what he considers to be "mocking" in the comments of the press and his political opponents. In fact, Trump publicly refers to these "political opponents" as "enemies."

The "coincidences" listed above have offered hard evidence that the Trump Administration -- with the assistance of its deeply involved friends in the Kremlin -- can cut the power to prevent the normal broadcast of Senate hearings and, even more egregiously, insert RT feed to CSPAN's normal broadcast of House of Representatives hearings. It is also noteworthy that these "coincidental interruptions" occurred at the precise moment the hearings were moving to focus on the SEC and Russian intervention in the election.

These incidents were a sign. Trump wanted to make certain that everyone in the Congress understood that "the rules have changed." There are certain topics which can no longer be broadcast to the American people.

With respect to the imposition of martial law, Trump has plenty of supporters who will scream with orgiastic delight if he "locks down" the nation's capital. If there exists any particular reason who these voters cast ballots for him, this may be as close as we get to understanding what that might be. Although the more stable elements of the Republican Party will be frantically gasping for air as they watch the GOP's already heavily soiled brand hit to land fill, the elected members of the House and Senate -- from both parties -- will be receiving a very clear, intimidating message.