Showing posts with label New Mexico Legislature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Mexico Legislature. Show all posts

Sunday, January 20, 2013

New Mexico Windows & the New Mexico Legislature


About This Post

This is another MeanMesa post in the series about job creation and economy growth in New Mexico.  Some of the most recent previous posts on this subject can be found at these MeanMesa links:
It is also important to note that this post is actually intended to accomplish a few things.  Most importantly, it presents an action plan which it would be nice for the Round House to consider.  If, as a New Mexican, you think that some or all of the proposals might actually help the State's economy, take a minute and email a note to Santa Fe.

Second, it contains the rationale behind the MeanMesa proposal to get New Mexico rental owners to participate in the window renovation plan. This part of MeanMesa's proposal is an important one.  New Mexicans with higher incomes are doing well enough, but the "poverty part" of being the "poorest state in the union" extends for miles in every direction from the gated communities -- like tattered wall paper.

State legislatures in more prosperous places have to deal with "pockets" of poverty.  New Mexico has "pockets" where there isn't poverty.

One would assume that Santa Fe is eagerly awaiting some sort of plan to address this!  This post runs through exactly what the role of our State government would be if they really wanted to help.

 A Quick Look At Where We Are

The MeanMesa posting first listed among the links above contains a few direct quotes from the Governor.

Gov. Susana Martinez must have been listening. While addressing local chambers of commerce on Jan. 3, she rolled out her New Century Jobs Agenda that included what has been called a “single sales factor” that would only tax products and services sold within the state. And she outlined a plan to reduce corporate income taxes from 7.6 percent to 4.9 percent for companies generating more than $1 million in net income.

and there was this,

Other aspects of the governor’s jobs agenda include: $10 million to fund the Local Economic Development Act for recruiting companies to the state; $4.75 million for hiring and training new employees through the Job Training Incentive Program; refining the capital outlay process for state infrastructure projects; passage of an “informed consent law” for spacecraft manufacturers and supplies; and increased investment in the New Mexico MainStreet program to preserve downtown historical and cultural locations.

 
These are "schemes."

Just the kind of "supply side schemes" that ALEC really likes.  The kind of "schemes" ALEC doesn't mind "paying" for, either.

The "supply side" aspect is worth just a little more inspection here.  What the Governor has proposed with the one sided corporate income tax exposure "scheme," has everything to do with making it even cheaper and even more profitable for companies which re-locate to New Mexico. 

Ask yourself.  What does policy like this do for the entire State of New Mexico?  The answer is: "next to nothing" compared to the advantages it carves out for the businesses that won't have to pay State income tax on almost any of what they produce.

The twenty or forty jobs created when one of these re-locations takes place will  probably employ New Mexicans who already had jobs.  Further, these jobs will last until the next state somewhere else offers a larger bribe to re-locate there.

There are two million people living here, and lots of them need jobs.  It's almost inconceivable that schemes like this can even hit the table in our State legislature.  It's like no one in the Round House can so much as think of anything else.

In the first quote, the Governor wants to reduce taxes by excluding any sales made to buyers outside of the state from New Mexico State [Corporate] income taxes.  But wait.  The things which are being produced in New Mexico can, basically, not be sold in New Mexico anyway  -- the poorest state in the union -- because New Mexicans don't have the discretionary wealth to buy expensive German solar panels, space trips, private jets or pricey computer gizmos.

Then in her second quote, the Governor is trotting out another $20 + Mn for "job training" and "bribing" out of state businesses to relocate here.  Maybe ideas like this would have sounded a little better if we had not already practically bankrupted ourselves trying them over and over already.

$20 Mn worth of State of New Mexico funding -- or even loan guarantees -- would pay for a pilot plant to produce windows.

Does this mean that we have to just keep trying these schemes as long as there is a dime left in the Treasury for another "tax expenditure"  financed incentive?  We really need to move on from the idea that New Mexico is at the brink of becoming Silicon Valley if we just throw enough State money at the transformation.

From the previous post on this subject, we can look again at exactly what is being proposed here.

The MeanMesa Windows Modernization Proposal

The over all goal of the proposal is to replace the inefficient casement windows which saturate every corner of our State with very affordable, modern insulated windows.  The replacement windows would be manufactured inside New Mexico.  The financing necessary for the purchase the new windows would be provided by State of New Mexico programs.  The installation labor would be performed exclusively by New Mexicans, trained, bonded and certified to do this work.  Both home owners and renters -- everyone who pays a monthly heating bill -- would benefit from the program.

Of course, that "benefit" that we're looking for here is an increase in discretionary wealth, that is, more money in New Mexican pockets to buy things.  This is absolutely the founding principle of what we have described as a demand economy.  When the discretionary wealth increases, well, "...it floats all boats."

So, where do we start?

Because it's very unlikely that the State legislature would be interested in managing something like this in the first place, the job will almost certainly be  handed off to a State "enterprise" management commission responsible for setting it, starting the process and running it once it starts.  The legislature might be willing to be responsible for some kind of "over sight" so long as the accounts arrive in Santa Fe in a nice, clean package.

We'll need to match up the actual work with folks who are competent to do it.  This is not a theoretical proposal.  With respect to schedule, this same Governor should appear on local television still in this term -- hopefully her last -- with the first window emerging from the new factory in New Mexico.

The Legislature's Part

 Of course most New Mexicans reading this post will assume that our State Legislature will do nothing.  The Governor will be too busy chasing after a electronic umbrella maker who is looking for a totally unregulated "profit paradise" where wages are as low as China, relocation incentives are high and folks will "look the other way" while his plant's effluent dribbles into the river.

All this brings up what might be one of the first things on the Legislature's "to do" list.

The State needs to establish a state "enterprise commission" to not only watch out for our state by watching over some of the relocated businesses which are already here, but to protect new enterprises such as the windows project from New Mexico's "natural predators" which have traditionally been able to crush dreams just as handily as, say, the US Senate.

1. Drunk, corrupt or incompetent locals who have no interest in an enterprise's success, and see it only as an opportunity for mismanagement, misdirection and theft.

2.  State Legislative ideologues -- such as ALEC "cross interest" politicians -- who will eagerly wreck even a sunny afternoon if it means a political advantage.

3. Ruthless out of state competitors who are equally eager to lay waste to an enterprise in New Mexico, take whatever loot breaks away easily -- usually complicit with someone in Santa Fe -- and leave with the cash.

It's time for New Mexico to quit being so surprised when this happens here, over and over.  Realistically planning for it can make all the difference in the world.

The necessity of improving the individual economic status of individual New Mexicans is not theoretical.  Sure, we've tried some things that didn't particularly work in the past, but that is no reason to allow the prospects for the task to grow an exaggerated difficulty or even slip into the realm of "impossibilities."

Let's look at the chart of legislative activities.

1.  Conduct the preliminary research for the pilot program:
  • plant site options
  • window design
  • area for pilot program window installation
  • financing criteria
  • program cost estimates

Site options:  The legislature has already constructed and paid for a fair number of unused buildings across the state.  Commercial real estate vacancies in Albuquerque -- including a few dreams about the use of the old rail way terminal -- are at an all time high in Albuquerque.  MeanMesa thinks the pilot program should probably go in somewhere which currently has a crippling unemployment problem.  There's no reason to wait to attack the problem.

Window design:  Low cost, high efficiency, cheap installation are all high priorities.  A window factory is nothing remotely similar to a computer chip manufacturing facility.  The window design could provide a good engineering contest for the technical universities the State supports.  The prize could be a scholarship.

[MeanMesa will have more designs to be engineered -- coming in later posts.]

Pilot Program Installation:  The pilot program is just that.  By limiting the region of the state which will receive the first windows, much of the transportation and installation labor issues will be more manageable. The experience derived from the pilot program's first installation phase will be invaluable.

Financing Offer: The  State's "enterprise management" entity can respond to unanticipated difficulties, mistakes and innovation advantages.  The pilot program installation will also be a good opportunity to work out the details of credit qualification, financing and other, business issues.

Cost Estimates:  Of course there will be a projected cost estimate for the pilot project along with a preliminary estimates for the cost of the project once it enters its matured state. The costs for manufacturing windows can be fairly well contained, but installation costs may be another case.

In any event, the actual costs for the pilot project should provide good data for the overall cost of the program once it is fully under way.

2. Write legislation to start the windows pilot project and fund it

Santa Fe wrote legislation to fund the New Mexico Space Port for $210 Mn.  That "enterprise" is now teetering at the edge of becoming the equivalent of a New Mexico Afghanistan.  The local news last night reported that the subsidized value of the facility investment which could be recouped in case of the project's failure would be worth around $3 Mn if the current trends continue.

With this as a preface, MeanMesa will be interested in hearing Santa Fe's arguments that the windows pilot project -- or at the very least, something similar to it -- is not needed, too expensive, too complicated or simply can't be attempted.

The space port provides around 60 jobs. Most of these employees would have been employed even if the space port had never been built. Even in the reduced scope of the windows pilot project there would be hundreds of jobs.  Many of these employees would have been unemployed without the windows project employment.

The manufacturing and installation work of the windows project can be located where the jobs are needed most and where the windows are needed most.

3. Set up a bi-partisan oversight committee to monitor project schedule and costs

First, there are no parts of the windows proposal which cannot be entirely transparent.  There are no convenient niches for technical secrets, financing secrets or political secrets.

Second, the folks in the Round House have to actually be capable of managing something.  This is not an unfair expectation.  MeanMesa doesn't even see the possible necessity of consultants for this mission.  New Mexicans have not had the best results from legislation which depended on consultant services.  Public service responsibilities and loyalty seem to vaporize somewhere "down the hall" in the consulting company offices.

4. Establish pilot program landmarks to verify project progress
5. Establish regular reports to New Mexicans about the project's progress
and,
6. Set up an educational program to completely explain the project to citizens

Program transparency with respect to both State policy and public interest needs a bit of rethinking here in New Mexico. In the past a theoretical trail of data which could be followed to finally reveal the facts has served as "transparency."  The predictable result is that common citizens find that they know less and less of the actual process under way in Santa Fe.

The results bring three dilemmas.  First, the frustration with the difficulty of establishing good information about the actions of State government leads to a stoic cynicism.  New Mexicans simply, and perhaps even somewhat understandably, "shut down."  What goes on in Santa Fe stays in Santa Fe.

Second, as citizen interest diminishes, citizen over sight also suffers.  This presents the less than entirely honorable folks in the State government with the cover needed for all sorts of corruption.  This claim could be more easily discharged as a simple exaggeration if we had not seen so many repeated examples.

Third, even when the efforts made in Santa Fe to govern the state fail miserably, the legitimate of outrage among voters has long since been exhausted.  The Round House should be filled with a continuing presence of voter outrage, but the voters have, instead, adopted a level of tacit acceptance.

The missing idea is not all that complicated.  Citizen interest must be courted.  The information to form a solid opinion about State policy still needs to be "marketed."  MeanMesa isn't entirely sure whether or not this is a foundational under pinning of the democracy idea, but, facing facts, it seems necessary.

Part of the legislative role in the windows project is to not only present the entire program to New Mexicans, but to also keep everyone informed along the way.  As mentioned before, there is nothing about this proposal which can be served by secrecy or reasonably be obscured by being deemed as "too sophisticated" for general consumption.

7. Legislative incentives for land lords to participate in the program

There are, to make things simple, three basic groups of New Mexicans as we consider the windows project.

a.] Home owners who already have installed high end thermal windows
b.] Home owners  who are currently unable to afford to install high end thermal windows
c.] Renters living in rental units which need efficient windows but with land lords who have no incentive to install them

While both the second and third groups comprise the target market locations for the project, the "incentive question" really affects the third group.  In terms of spurring growth in the state economy by increasing discretionary wealth by lowering non-discretionary spending on home heating, this third group is what we can call a "gold mine."

Any reductions in heating bills will immediately leave more money in the pockets of this group -- money which we know will be spent.  When this happens, demand increases.  We already know that the jobs the windows project will introduce will help the economy, but when renters have lower heating bills, that will increase the economy even more. When demand increases, the economy grows.

We clearly need to "break the habit" of distributing thermal efficiency subsidies exclusively to home owners.  The real pay back is waiting when we can offer these advantages to renters.

Let's just allow this narrative to enter the realm of imagination.  Of course, there's legislative work to do, but instead of threading through all of that, we can envision what things would be like after it was done.

If you are a land lord, you would have hired a thermal imaging service to make winter time infra red pictures of the apartments you want to rent.  These would provide the information needed to calculate the over all "R" factor -- the apartment's thermal efficiency based on the heat loss shown in the survey photograph.

When you show your apartment to a potential renter, you could then tell that renter what this "R" rating was.  While the renter would naturally be interested in the amount of rent for the apartment, he would also be quite interested in the apartment's insulation efficiency.  The information about the "R" factor would be a good way to estimate how much the heating bill was going to run during the winter.

While MeanMesa is sure that the ALEC "free market" influence in the Round House would prevent this from ever becoming an actual law, as a land lord, you would realize that the other apartments your potential renter was considering were, most likely, offering this information.

The apartment with good thermal insulation -- and, consequently, lower heating bills -- would be chosen even if the rent were the same.  The way things are now, land lords don't have to compete with the heating efficiency of the apartments they offer.  In the terms understandable to the "free enterprisers," this means that renters enjoy no advantage from competition on this basis.  

It means that there is very little possibility for one of the "free enterprisers'" favorite things -- a "market correction."

"Hello.  We were looking at the apartment you advertised.  Can you tell us the unit's 'R' factor please?"

"I ain't lettin' no big government thugs tell me what I gotta' do with my own property."

"Oh, I see.  Good bye."

If the land lord winds up with crappy thermal efficiency for his apartments, he's not simply stuck.  The Windows Modernization Program will include State financing or loan guarantees for this land lord to improve the "R" factors of his rental units by installing efficient windows made right here in New Mexico.

Hmmm.  Window manufacturing jobs.  Window installation jobs. Window and supply transportation jobs.  Manufacturing facility construction and maintenance jobs.  Financing access jobs. Infra red photography jobs.  Informed renters.  Increased discretionary wealth.  More demand.  Growing economy.

8. Lay out full scale windows modernization program

With a pilot project accomplished, and the inevitable challenges addressed and solved, the path forward to a full scale project becomes quite manageable.  All the "moving parts" of this program won't magically appear over night, but none of those "moving parts" are imponderables.  They are all quite straight forward.

They can all be managed.

This means that whatever might "come up" during the process can be handled, fixed, adjusted, replaced, rethought and so on.  All we need is the will to get busy and start solving our economic "poverty" problem.

Stay Tuned!  There's More To Come

While this post is primarily about the legislative leadership we will need, the next MeanMesa post in this series will be all about what will happen "on the ground."

We hope you're not getting tired of proposals.  There are more after the windows modernization program.


Saturday, November 10, 2012

New Mexico: Recovery Jump Start or Marshall Plan?

The Election is Over.
MeanMesa is Back.
Let's Get To Work.
This is no time to be "lolly gagging" around.  We have an economy to rebuild. (image source)
Transforming New Mexico Into
 Silicon Valley - Over Night
Don't hold your breath, but hang onto your check book.

There is an absolutely fascinating neo-conservative conversation rolling along in New Mexico.  It seems like any plan which might possibly assist New Mexico's economy must first pass through a "supply side" litmus test before it can continue on to reach the play ground of New Mexico's over-financed "denial Disney Land" -- it doesn't matter, of course, whether the ferris wheel has been installed in the Round House or the Albuquerque Mayor's office.

The ALEC induced "supply side" checks authored in Santa Fe usually have more zeros in the pay slot than their counterparts drifting silently around behind the "famous closed doors" in Albuquerque mayor's office, but their sheer matter of scope fails to make them any more valid -- that is, any more representational -- than the more local grift.

Returning to the neo-con conversation, it may be notable for many things, but it is certainly notable for its longevity and durability.  It seems to remain the theme song even after an perpetually unavoidable, reliably depressing series of failures.  Although the astounding variety of schemes has run the full gamut of ALEC-neo-con "bright shiny objects," there is, in fact, a common thread.

In each case, the basic model seems to be a disturbing repetition of the preceding one with just a tiny bit more lipstick.  The common thread is found in the relentless, overly eager chorale of the ALEC cheerleaders.  They must all imagine that their scam is going to unfold in Alabama or New Jersey instead of New Mexico.

It is extra discouraging to count the number of supporting votes these expensive monstrosities receive from state Democrats.

We're Already Dancing as Fast as We Can

Every one of these dreams really does run along predictable tracks.  In each effort, some fragment of New Mexico's economy suddenly begins to behave just like an economy somewhere else!  A shard of desolate, nearly worthless real estate is suddenly -- almost magically -- transformed into an exact replica of Silicon Valley with thousands of happy, well paid employees, courageous, innovative management and smiling stock holders lounging around a country club pool.

Of course, along the way, the state or the city ponies up enough "starter money" -- usually, but not always, in the form of tax expenditures -- to build a road or cease collecting taxes for a few years -- and then rushes off to an out of state public relations firm to spread the good news.  As for us citizens, we do our part by believing them.

The annual average for "incentive and motivational" money draining from state and city coffers into relief from normal "business expenses" for these "Gosh are we ever lucky to have them" new enterprises is around $1.3 Bn across the state.

We New Mexicans would love to have a look at these "success stories," a glimpse at the figures revealing how many new jobs were drawn into the state or the city, but -- hold your horses.  The Governor and the Round House just finished having a spat about exactly who would be "researching" and "evaluating" that list.

Presumably, the non-ALEC bunch on the Democratic side of the legislature wanted a chance to look over the wreckage to see how well this was working, but in the end, the Governess transferred the examination responsibility to her in-office staff.  If patterns hold from this point forward, her "appraisal" will ultimately be contracted to some firm in Texas or Arizona after she concludes that her New Mexico experts just simply don't have the expertise.

That would be the "expertise" required to arrive at the right "conclusions."

Facing Facts

Stumbling along with the promise of low cost labor, previously "incentivized" corporations such as Intel and HP are now circling aimlessly in the Rio Rancho desert wishing they had never taken the bait.  Yes, New Mexican labor is cheap.  No, New Mexican labor can't actually build computers, design chips or particularly innovate consumer products that will shock China into an economic stand still.

The other suspicious part of these high tech export industries has to do with markets.  MeanMesa has always been ready to "chirp" out the "demand side" of the nation's economic woes, and the same tune fits just as well when we consider New Mexico as an individual State.

The constantly repeated "integrated into the world market" might be relevant to New York or Los Angeles, but when applied to Rio Rancho, not so much.  For a dozen good reasons, New Mexico can't handle the vagaries of those "world markets."  The style and quality of management skills found in the State don't help much, either.

The current market for cheap, unskilled labor in the US is not one driven by scarcity.  When New Mexico offers this up to prospective new businesses as an incentive to come here, the balloon is already half flat before they're off the phone.  Far too often, what is initially touted as cheap, unskilled labor becomes something equivalent to WalMart where cheap labor is further refined into exploited labor, and low wages must be supplemented by state funded social support, effectively converting State tax money into corporate profit for the Walton pockets.

Whatever the fundamentals supporting the growth and health of the New Mexico economy, we really can scratch off heavily incentivised, highly subsidized, high technology manufacturing right away.  The dream is pretty enough, but the reality is like the now infamous "job creators" who keep consuming resources without producing results.

Our State's version of these "job creators" has plenty of amateurish, crooked politicians and other creatures which have descended here during the night from powerfully parasitic "visitors" such as ALEC.  The incredible collection of expensive repetitions of the "great jobs creation wet dream" amounts to no more than a New Mexican State tooth ache -- a picture of frustration and infuriation about the opportunities we've missed because we were plowing all of our development dollars into these "whirl winds."

New Mexico's future, sustainable economy will clearly not to be ushered in by the likes of Eclipse private jets or German solar panels.  Further, if not the high tech dream machine, then what?

 Solutions
We can start right away.
MeanMesa doesn't like to paint pictures of hopelessness and surrender.  Most New Mexicans are feeling understandably "down in the mouth" about this long series of failures, and the ones who aren't feeling depressed are, most likely, the same ones who were close enough to these boondoggles to walk away with some of that incentive money in their own pockets.
The way ahead will definitely not simply be a matter of "tweeking" the train wreck back onto the tracks.  New Mexico will need something akin to a "state-sized" Marshall Plan, but we can do this.  We can probably even pay for it in a reassuringly straight forward way once we quit wasting our development resources on expensive things that never develop.

MeanMesa has been off the air for a few weeks during the election, but now that's largely complete.  We are officially moving from the "politics phase" to the "governance phase" of both our Federal and State democracies.

This means that it's high time for some good ideas.  And, if we agree that the old ideas haven't worked for beans, the term "good ideas" means "new ideas."  MeanMesa has never been bashful about sharing new ideas, and this is no exception.  Here's the plan.

The blog-bunker already has a rough outline of the legislative work needed to transform the New Mexico economy -- along with a good list of economic development projects which can actually be done.  The picture of what we must demand from our state legislators is also filling out nicely.

Finally, MeanMesa sees the mood of the state beginning to move toward something quite different for our future.  That "something" must be carefully described, planned and, most importantly, demanded.  There is nothing material standing in the way of us moving toward the goals we have.

Here's what's to come.

First, there will be an announcement of a new member to MeanMesa, a co-author who will be adding a stereophonic second voice to some of the posts.  Second, there will be a series of posts which describe specific plans which the legislature should be considering to promote economic development.

Right now, the only folks writing new plans for New Mexico seems to be ALEC.  Naturally, ALEC plans, authored and promoted by outside corporate interests, can hardly be expected to serve the interests of the state.  MeanMesa has the bold ambition of inserting itself into that fray right away.

We'll be visiting soon.

One Final Thing

Every time Barack Obama smiles, an oligarch loses his wings.








Wednesday, April 18, 2012

ALEC New Mexico - Anti-Democracy in the High Desert

 A Glimpse at the work of National ALEC

There has been no shortage of comments about ALEC on the national stage once enough of the organization's "pet projects" were collected and publicized.  As usual, the most egregious examples were the first to be cast into the light.  However, ALEC prefers to routinely operate as quietly and invisibly as possible.  It is the ultimate "back room" operation with just enough visible connections to succeed in accomplishing its reactionary goals amid a literal "army" of connections and associations in the background to provide the cash and enjoy the profits.  

Just a few ALEC's accomplishments in states under Republican control will sound familiar enough, but hidden just below the radar, we see a veritable cloud of similar antics now passed into law everywhere the opportunity materialized after the 2010 election.

ALEC = State Laws Against Abortion Rights Established Under Roe vs. Wade

ALEC = State Stand Your Ground Laws in 22 states

ALEC = State Voter Suppression by Registration and ID Laws

ALEC = Ending State Law Requiring Equal Pay for Women

ALEC advertises itself as a bipartisan organization which assists state legislators with bills which will benefit its corporate sponsors.  It isn't actually bipartisan, of course, it has an almost purely Republican membership.  There are one of two Really Stinky Blue Dog Democrats who routinely participate in ALEC's anti-democracy activities at the national level.

Although these so-called Democrats pay serious attention to being essentially invisible in ALEC's legislative moves, their association is revealed in legislation they sponsor.

In fact, ALEC is notable for this same kind of "invisibility."  The organization just bumped along below the radar until the murder of Trayvon Martin in Florida.  One defense bandied about for the shooter was derived from the Florida "Stand Your Ground" law.  This particular bit of legalized savagery was introduced in the Florida legislature by Republicans who got the text for the law from an ALEC conference.  The law was supplied to the ALEC conference by the executives of the national NRA who also provided staff to assist the legislators.

The law's journey after this beginning was well lubricated by financing from the corporate arms manufacturers and a small collection of 2nd Amendment crazies.

This basic story has been repeated in most of the states which emerged from the tea bag explosion of 2010 with a Republican take over of the Governor's mansion and both the respective state Senate and House.  In the most egregious cases, such as Wisconsin and Michigan, the corruption also spread to the state Supreme Courts.  

In these cases citizens found themselves with absolutely no Constitutional capacity to slow or stop the cascade of regressive ALEC legislative proposals which began to flow immediately.  MeanMesa must also note that this dismal predicament was made possible primarily by voters who did not vote in the 2010 election.  A rabid, semi-literate minority took charge.  Worse, it was a minority which had been carefully groomed by massive corporate financing and an utterly lurid, anti-democratic cabal of drooping evangelical, wing nut theocrats and an ugly batch of thinly disguised law firms such as Freedom Works -- along with an unsavory collection of millionaires and billionaires thrown in for good measure.

Commenting much more about ALEC's national priorities would amount to "water over the bridge," but MeanMesa is determined to prowl around a bit in the other side of the story -- the hidden side.  The outrages in Wisconsin and Virginia may be tasty headline material, but what about all the little creepy moves which have been made elsewhere across the country?

ALEC in New Mexico

New Mexico didn't take the plunge found in tea bag territory.  Yes, the state elected a Republican Governor -- a previously failed Democrat who attempted her elevation to "better things" while being a prosecutor.  Martinez found plenty more campaign contributors once she changed parties.  Further, she enjoyed the passing advantage of replacing a popular Democrat whose feet began turning to clay very quickly after he left office.

The State House and Senate remained in Democratic control after the 2010 race, although Democratic majorities decreased.  Unlike states where Republicans took control across the board, New Mexico maintained a Congressional Democratic presence at the national level and a generally respected State Supreme Court.

Further, unlike states where Republicans and ALEC were very interested in gaining a position from which they could launch another one of their predictable State Treasury "looting festivals," New Mexico has never been rich.  Of course, there were a few "jewels" which would catch ALEC's fancy, but much of the nut case evangelical parts faltered in the face of a long standing domination by the Catholic Church.

So what was left for the ALEC vultures in the high desert?

Although a MeanMesa visitor might, at first, assume that ALEC and its local Republican representatives would have encountered "slim pickin's" as they sized up the looting possibilities from such a poor place, it turns out that this is not the case.  This post is about what bills ALEC folks jammed through the State Government.  They are not exactly what one would expect, but the distinctive smell is still all around it.

The following list names State of New Mexico bills which were initially composed by ALEC legislative experts, handed to Republican New Mexico State lawmakers at ALEC "Conferences" and then introduced in the New Mexico legislature. What is shown below is the result of research done by The Center for Media and Democracy -- ALEC Exposed.  (Read the entire article here.)

(NOTE: In an effort to peacefully coexist with the mechanics of Blogger, MeanMesa has disabled the superscripted footnote references in this reprint of the source article.  All of this information is in the original research.  Access it by following the link.)

So, what did these bills have to "do" or "be" to show up on the list of ALEC legislation in New Mexico?

The reason they are on the list has a few different sides, each of which is important.  However, first, take a look at the bills.  (Read the entire article here.)

New Mexico

(This page includes tips from reporters, citizens journalists, and others identifying New Hampshire bills (introduced or passed) that resemble ALEC model legislation. CMD encourages the use of this forum and encourages further detailed research to verify all claims.)
  • HB 386 (introduced 2/7/11) "Transparency in Private Attorney Contracts" is similar to ALEC's "Private Attorney Retention Sunshine Act"
  • HB 318 (introduced 2/2/11) "Crime of Organized Retail Theft Act" is similar to ALEC's "Organized Retail Theft Act"
  • SB 324 (introduced 1/31/11) "Licensure of Secondhand Metal Dealers" is similar to ALEC's "Responsible Scrap Metal Purchasing and Procurement Act"
  • House Joint Memorial 24 (introduced 1/27/11), "Requesting Governor to Withdraw New Mexico from the Western Climate Initiative" is similar to ALEC's "State Withdrawal from Regional Climate Initiatives"
  • HB 229 (introduced 1/27/11) "Parental Notice of Abortion Act" is similar to ALEC's "Parental Consent for Abortion Act"
  • HB 105 (introduced 1/19/05) "Income Tax Deduction for Organ Donation" is similar to ALEC's "Organ Donation Tax Deduction Act"

Why ALEC Wants Bills Like These

We mentioned before that ALEC bills have a few revealing "similar" sides to them.  In fact, these "similarities" also explain why a little blog like MeanMesa would take such umbrage with the process and its results.  Let's look at precisely what we mean by these "similarities" because they don't seem to be exactly what we might have expected for routine GOPCon "looting" mischief.

Further, the "most interesting" of all the ideas which reach a legislator's office will almost inevitably have one or more of the following qualities:

1. they will increase the number of favorable votes in the next election
2. they will result in "campaign contributions" from the special interests 
who will benefit from them
3. they will directly benefit either the legislator himself or some of his good friends


...all without seriously screwing up the existing state economy or completely outraging any sizable existing voting block.

1.  The CONTENT of ALEC Bills

Normally, New Mexico elected officials receive letters and phone calls from their constituents requesting or suggesting new legislation that someone or other wanted introduced and passed in the State Legislature.  If these ideas are clearly something which would benefit the State, and if enough of these phone calls and letters arrive at the State Legislator's office, the elected Representative or Senator calls on staff and instructs them to write the proposed legislation.

No one particularly expects legislators to be able to just sit down with a marker and a napkin to rough out a final form with legislative content.

(Chart - MeanMesa)

Right here, we arrive at the first identifying quality of ALEC sponsored bills.  They are not written by legislators or by their staff in a normal way.  Instead, the "template" for the words, terms and text of these bills comes directly from ALEC.

This is the first reason that they have wound up on the list. Because they are clearly and unavoidably so similar to ALEC "templates" that there can be no doubt at all that the content originated there.  In most cases a few "cosmetic" adjustments are introduced to the ALEC form before it moves on to the New Mexico legislature, but usually not many.

2. The ORIGIN of ALEC Bills

As mentioned above, the basic idea of a representational democracy is that State Congressmen, once elected, have a good reason to respond to the needs and wishes of the New Mexicans who elected them.  Further, this is not just a handy "high flung" talking point extracted from a High School Civics text.  Believe it or not, this basic idea should be the "main engine" for legislation in the state's Roundhouse.

However, in the case of ALEC sponsored bills, this basic idea is not in place.  ALEC, in the organization's well financed "conventions" and "conferences," has already usurped this traditional idea of responding to constituents. 

In "think tank bunkers" far from New Mexico a process similar to the traditional idea of representative democracy unfolds -- however, those interests whom are being "represented" are not the constituents of the elected legislators in New Mexico.  Instead, the phone calls, emails and letters received in the "think tank bunker" all come from folks who, well, want something.

Anyone among these folks seeking to be "represented" who might be too timid to actually put his "wishes" in writing, can, of course, just send his lobbyist to do the dirty work.  Publicity-wise, this is very convenient.  The ALEC "go-to" scoundrels need not be prowling around the Roundhouse to accomplish this.  It can all be done very, very quietly at the "everything is on the house" bar at an ALEC "convention."

Although the New Mexico legislators enjoying those free drinks won't be paying anything, New Mexicans back home will be -- once the ALEC "template" becomes State Law.

(Chart - MeanMesa)
An Anecdote About ALEC "Conferences"

(Read this entire Center for Media and Democracy's PR Watch here.)

Where Do Donations from Corporations or Corporate Foundations Go?

Campaign CashFor one, they help subsidize legislators' trips to attend ALEC meetings. ALEC has reported to the IRS that it has liabilities of about one million dollars a year for "scholarship funds." These are not scholarships for kids who do well in school; they are financial gifts called "scholarships" to help cover the costs of the family vacations that legislators and their families take to ALEC conventions at resorts every August, after their state legislative sessions end. For these conventions, legislative members are charged a registration fee that is substantially less than what corporate members pay. Some undisclosed number of legislators have their airfare and hotel costs for trips to these posh hotels paid by ALEC. As part of the registration process, legislators can arrange for childcare, which ALEC dubs "Kids Congress," for six-month old babies to teens for $250. ALEC reports that it has spent over $250,000 for childcare for meetings in 2009.

ALEC also spends about $600,000 a year on what it describes as the "recruitment and retention of ALEC State Legislator members." For an organization that claims such devotion to the free market, it is difficult to imagine an ordinary business justification for spending $600,000 to recruit and retain legislative members who only contribute about $80,000 a year in income to ALEC. But plainly, such a lop-sided loss must be covered by other returns on investment. Indeed, ALEC brags about how over 1,000 of its model bills get introduced in statehouses each year, but sticks to its claim that its bill factory does not count as "lobbying."

ALEC's corporate "state chairs" -- companies whose identities are not publicly disclosed by ALEC -- are expected to raise "state scholarship funds" for state legislators to attend ALEC conventions. ALEC's by-laws from 2007 also provide that the legislators who serve as state chairmen have a "duty" to work with the corporate state chairmen "to raise and oversee expenditures of legislative scholarship funds." In other words, select corporations work directly with legislators to raise money from other corporations to subsidize trips for legislators to ALEC events. State chairmen are also tasked with "working to ensure introduction of model legislation." The scholarship funds are apparently essential to ALEC's operations, because most state legislators work as public servants part-time and earn, on average, about $46,000 a year. Without ALEC's subsidy, not as many of them would likely be willing or able to use the ALEC convention as a family trip. But ALEC membership does provide other rewards for legislators. It allows them to rub elbows with rich, out-of-state potential donors to their election campaigns and also to build similar relationships with ALEC's state corporate members.

Right here, we may as well present the list of New Mexico State Senators and Representatives who have "ties" with ALEC -- lots and lots of "R's."  (Note: links are left enabled, but superscripted footnote references have been removed.  These can be found at the link privided.  Read the original article from SourceWatch/ALEC Exposed here.)

New Mexico Legislators with ALEC Ties

House of Representatives

Senate

(Image source - Congressional Web Sites)

So, if you're ALEC, and you have a few stinky little laws you would like to impose on the citizens of New Mexico, these are your guys.  More than likely, some of the legislation proposed by these two actually fits into one or more of the traditional reasons State legislators write and sponsor bills at the Roundhouse.  Some (check out the list of "ALEC Template" bills) clearly don't.

In fact, those bills being introduced which "clearly don't" fall into some combination of the three categories of "normal reasons" for a legislator to introduce something still have to come from somewhere.  So, where do they come from?

(Diagram - MeanMesa)


3. What ALEC Bills Are About - Follow the Money

When we see the phrase "follow the money," we usually draw a sigh of relief because we assume that in no time at all, we will be presented with a nicely convincing "smoking gun" to follow it.   Yet, when we look at the list of ALEC "template" bills these two have jumbled through the State Legislature, we just don't see the kind of outrage which we might have, at first, expected.

"Outrage?"

Yes.  A "legislative outrage" bill would simply hand over all sorts of state concessions to, for example, a corporation as an incentive to move here.  There might be tax breaks, state financed infrastructure, relaxed zoning, and so on.  It turns out that ALEC's think tank bill writing experts are far more sophisticated than this.

However, a single thread runs through just about every idea that can be cooked up by one of ALEC's "back room oligarchs."  Here it is:

"Any money which can be extracted from the State budget anywhere is a plus because, after it reverts back to the General Fund, it can be looted."

For example, when we see Southern states eliminating women's health services, the plan is richly lubricated with "red meat" anti-abortion schemes to further inflame the local evangelical base.  They like it because it kills Roe vs. Wade.  ALEC likes it because it eliminates state funding for women's health clinics.  Whatever money is saved by the change, you guessed it, flows back into the state's general fund where it can be looted later.

Other bills quietly eliminate expensive corporate costs arising from State laws.  Some add or subtract criterion to laws which deliver a benefit to an ALEC sponsor.  Some are "party favors" for single interest groups -- groups which, although they may travel under the furling banners of 2nd Amendment rights and the NRA, are actually the accountants for gun and ammunition manufacturers and marketers.

Done properly, almost no ALEC "template" bill has anything showing which might be a clue as it to its actual purpose.



(Diagram - MeanMesa)

We see the special interests of the oligarch class, each time, cleverly disguised as something else and also, each time, thinly coated with the latest "conservative" agenda element to placate the unthinking, uninformed and uninterested voters.  In fact, those "unthinking, uninformed and uninterested voters" are exactly the ballots these little skunks count on to get re-elected.  When these voters are properly inflamed over issues such as abortion, immigration, gun control (the popular "stand your ground and shoot first" justifiable homicide laws) and dozens of others, they show little interest in looking after their own interests when they cast their ballots.

This is the case across the United States, not just in New Mexico.

ALEC legislation routinely steals from both those who think these laws are great and those who think they are hideous.  It just takes a little longer than the shaky bank robber with the rusty pistol to "seal the deal."

What ColorOfChange is Doing About ALEC

Perhaps the most effective player among the main thrust to expose ALEC and publicize the organization's main contributors has been a relatively new group called ColorOfChange.  Another hero in this battle is Ed Schultz who has generously placed ColorOfChange speakers in front of his national network cameras often in the last months.

To their credit ColorOfChange publicity has already split away some of ALEC's largest corporate sponsors, but don't worry.  There is still a nice bunch of billionaires in ALEC's back room who know a good thing when they see one.  The ColorOfChange bunch knows where to hit something as invisibly grotesque as ALEC -- in the pocket book.

MeanMesa has posted a few links (below) for visitors wishing to read more on this subject.  There is plenty more waiting for you on your Google.

Links for Further Reading About ALEC


http://colorofchange.org/press/releases/2012/4/17/colorofchange-responds-alec-announcement-it-will-e/
http://www.alec.org/meetings/
http://www.thenation.com/article/162478/hidden-history-alec-and-prison-labor
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2011/07/10887/cmd-special-report-alecs-funding-and-spending
http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/New_Mexico